Modify Low Volume Plan and get the most out of Adaptive Training

Hi all! Just started using TR and would like your advice on how to get the most out of plan builder and adaptive training. For the last 3 months (pre-trainerroad) I had been doing a traditional base plan of my own design. I was doing 7-10h per week, 3:1 loading:unloading (except for a two week unloading around an illness), TSS mostly in the 250-450 range, lots of Z2 and 2 intervals workouts per week (5x5x1 at threshold - not VO2). My goal event is ~4h gravel event in August.

How would you transition from this to a trainerroad plan? I used plan builder to set something up, but wasn’t sure what volume to select. I’ve listened to the ask a cycling coach podcast and heard lots of references to doing a low volume plan and then adding in train now workouts to supplement. I have currently selected LVSSB, LV General Power Build, Rolling Road Race - with the expectation of adding a bunch more rides myself. If I am only getting about half my hours or less from workouts in the plan, will I undermine the specificity of the plan even if I respect the loading/unloading it expects?

In my first week I’ve added a couple of longer endurance rides, a recovery ride and then lengthened the sweet spot and threshold rides.

When I say “undermining” I don’t mean to suggest that we need 4 days off per week - I’m more questioning whether AT will either over or under level my key workouts based on the additional workouts/TSS. I’m using intervals.icu to track hours, distribution of intensity, TSS and ramp rate. I’m really into the idea of a more productive build phase from these 3 key workouts. When you’re keeping things “light and easy,” do you intentionally choose rides that are “achievable” or even easier based on how your legs are feeling?

Here’s what I’ve got planned so far:

Fighting the algorithm like that is what I was wondering about when I talked about “undermining the plan.” I’m putting railings up with target hours/tss and then monitoring closely for fatigue/soreness/HRV changes.

Has anyone found themselves battling AT rather than working together for faster times? If so, what did you do to get back on the same page?

Your goal is to get faster and you’re usiing both TR plan and additional rides. I believe it doesn;t matter either way. The real proof will be found 1 or 2 months once you do a FTP test.

If you overdo it in your additional rides then you’ll be more tired and as long as you answer the survey honestly, AT will take that into account and nerf the workouts. / the PL won’t progress as fast. However that’s ok because that’s because you pedaled harder on the outside rides.
If you 're careful that the additional rides don’t interfere much with the TR workouts, meaning you 're able to rest enough and complete the structured rides as AT provides then you’ll progress faster on the PL.

I do the TR Low Volume plans because I found that it’s psychologically it’s much better to add workout toa a LV plan than to always be behind a MV or High volume plan.

I agree with the “proof is in the pudding” concept - though I imagine some of us who are messing with the plans can set ourselves up to be monsters in base/build and peak early. It looks like the plans do a good job of balancing volume/intensity as below.

image
Hoping to peak August/September

This totally makes sense to me. Working in and emergency department, I have a very irregular work schedule. The idea of moving 3 key workouts around and building on top feels like I’m doing positive - while cutting workouts would always feel a little suspect.

Realized that this was probably better suited to training category than the software category. ::bump::