I find that on a tri after the bike when jumping to the run you tend to go faster than what is sustainable, so even if you take off faster, it’s not sustainable and may harm you at the end of the run
Thank you for the talk on Cadence and how it relates to traction in the XC world. I’ve been struggling with this, so hearing about significant a cadence difference between road and dirt was a big help to me. I’ve stayed at 85 rpm off road but my road cadence has increased along with the power output since starting TR. I was wondering if I needed to go back and do more single leg drills. Based on this, I’ll stick with the plan as-is.
Only part way through and already amazed at how well all did their research and opinions. THIS is GREAT stuff! Keep it up for those triathletes in the crowd who have experienced much of this in races. Good to see the research. You guys are so awesome…my favorite podcasts by far!
Hello guys, I love your podcast.
I have a question: could you give us a baseline on which things to do after a workout and in what order?
For example: You finish a workout. In the first 15 minutes, do some strength exercises (for example, planks, Y, Z). Then do some stretching exercises (e.g. X, Y, Z stretches). After that, replening your glycogen stores by eating something, etc.
It would be really helpful! Thanks in advance,
Klemen
My ears perked up on the low cadence discussion and wanted to check in here.
In events that have extended climbs with 10-15% gradients I need to spin at 65 RPMs to work at a sustainable SS power range. By the end of the climb my legs are TOAST for the rest of the event. My aerobic condition is fine and I can push power on flats and descents. But then the next rolling hills come and the lights go out in my legs. Rinse repeat. Fine on flats, toast on hills.
It made me think that if I can get my spin to 80 (though training to peak power/weight and easier gearing) I wouldn’t destroy my legs.
Does that idea hold water? Or do I need to train my legs more to push more watts at low RPM?
I haven’t listened yet, but my first year of cycling I did a bunch of climbs at 60-65rpm. The longest day saw 8 hours of climbing at low cadence, not saying that was ideal, but I was able to finish the 123 mile / 15,000’ event strong and woke up feeling just fine.
It definitely holds water from my experience. I spin at a higher cadence than my buddies when climbing for longer periods. This typically helps my legs last a little longer and useful for other parts of the ride. When I feel that my heart rate may be increasing more than I’d like I’ll drop the cadence a little and rely more on my legs for a few minutes before hitting an easier gear and ramping up the cadence again. I always like to think of it this way: higher cadence works the heart slightly more, lower cadence works the legs slightly more - switching to one gives the other a little break/rest when you need it.