I donāt disagree with you that the different zones are not comparable in terms of levels, but I would add that I suspect they might be closer (and shaped in general) for the general TR population.
Youāve obviously done a lot of SS Progression (thanks for your help on that thread), but a lot of people find long SS tough. I hazard a guess that the levels are shaped by compliance.
I donāt look at any of these as being precise guides. Itās all in a range with lots of overlap and is just a rough metric of fitness increase that is more granular than a MAP test every 4-8 weeks.
Iām not overly concerned with the absolute numbers, which are hard to pin down precisely, but the rate of improvement and correlation of that with improvement in other zones. Improvement in one zone often carries over with improvement in others zones. So it just isnāt an accurate measure to show a large relative increase in one zone and barely see any increase in adjacent zones. Especially as you move down from threshold.
For anyone interested I have my week 18 training vlog up, itās hard to believe Iāve done just about an entire base-build cycle with AT. Iāve got race footage exporting now so Iām gonna do a race breakdown (which in essence will be pointing out all the times I stunk at holding wheels in the crit) so stay tuned.
i did workout gaaslande outside yesterday (basically 45sec on at 123% and 45sec off) and got served a struggle survey but I didnāt struggle, I was able to say I didnāt struggle and mark it as moderate. Not going to spend too much time speculating on why it might have thought I didnāt succeed. I did have a NP of over threshold for 25min, definitely not going to complain about that!
Little bit of a random question, if I cut the rests down/out of a workout will it still mark as a success, or will it think Iāve failed/cut-short?
I assume that I might be able to do that to shorten my workout tomorrow morning as I donāt believe hitting or missing the power target during the rear intervals effects things, but itād be nice to know.
(Three Fools -1 reducing the rests from five to one or two minutes, and the cooldown from five to say one minute. Just for reference sake.)
I donāt think rest matters. I regularly pause during rest because I need to take care of something and never had an issue. Iāve also skipped rest when I needed to finish early and workout counted just the same (as far as I can tell).
That said, ending early might affect it. At least it did when I accidentally ended the one outside workout Iāve done early.
Yeah, Iāve definitely had the cut short one when Iāve ended my endurance spin early after my workout. Iām hoping the cooldown will be treated the same as rest 
Let us know. The one I ended early outside was missing the cool down. I didnāt get a struggle survey, but also didnāt get what should have been a bump in PL. that may have been because it was outside though, and nothing to do with missing cool down.
You may get a struggle survey but I think one of the answers is āran out of timeā or similar. This is important because if you select āintensityā or whatever in the struggle survey itāll try to back you off, if you run out of time etc it knows you didnāt struggle per se.
Another solution would be to use the āalternatesā function to choose an equivalent workout at a shorter duration which you can fit. Just also noting that if you do shorten the recoveries, you are effectively making the workout harder - so if you were doing that on purpose, you could pick a shorter workout at a slightly higher PL in āalternatesā. This means youāll actually get the PL credit for the workout being slightly harderā¦
Might have been mentioned but weāve hit over 4k replies and some things have changed over time as things get fixed.
Iām supposed to have a workout today but instead, I have an exam (which aside I am not ready for!) so want to do it tomorrow. I know it used to be the case that moving it would pull it from AT.
Is this still the case? Should I leave it on today and just open and complete it tomorrow or is moving things an option now?
This is true for the workout being adapted (in that it will no longer be adapted), but it will still be included towards future adaptions. So with it being so soon i.e. tomorrow; both of your options would suffice 
Brilliant, cheers mate!
We need a wiki!
Lets be honest. There are so many threads, nobody can read them all.
I would really appreciate some Kind of wiki or a how to rlated to AT.
Nacht ce Greets!
That Truchas+5 just looks like an easy 25m TT to me, But as an outside ride mine donāt count 
I think a number of people in the beta have commented on this, and it seems a very valid point.
I suspect that in this current (āv1ā) release of AT we shall just have to deal with this issue ourselves, as best we can, as youāve done by manually scheduling tougher workouts aimed at capturing your true levelsā¦
But my guess is that so-called secondary progressions are something that might be improved significantly in future AT releases. NB not in the current beta release, but in full version future releases in the coming years, as TR work to improve their models.
I think the PL system is a very good innovation and gives them an excellent platform to build on, but realistically the earlier versions - like we have access to in todayās v1.beta - are always going to be limited in sophistication compared to where things may end up a few years down the line as refinements are made and the platformās potential maximised.
A wiki would be helpful as a searchable resource. Also know you can use the search function of this forum to find a lot of the answers in the same way. You can even limit the search to the current thread or specific users. While not the same as a wiki, it does provide some similar use.
In any case, right now the best resource is the below article, which has an FAQ at the end with a lot of the common questions people have:
Iām wanting to do a Zwift ride up Alpe du Zwift, which is going to be 60 mins just below FTP I reckon. Is there anything clever I can do to have AT recognise this ride? Perhaps a 60 mins sweet spot session associated with it? Would I need to record it on my Garmin as an outside ride then associate it??
I personally would just treat it like an outdoor ride and score the survey as you would for an outdoor ride. That way it is categorized and used properly once the update to AT that Nate has alluded to finally hits. Of course, that means sacrificing progressions in the moment for accuracy in the future.
More to the point, associating it to a workout wonāt necessarily make it work. Others have tried this with outdoor rides to little or no effect. You could, however, run TR and Zwift concurrently and pick a 60-min sweetspot interval workout and complete the workout on TR while sending the power and cadence data to Zwift at the same time. Of course this means you wonāt feel the grades of the mountain on Zwfit, but it will give you progression for the workout selected.
Golden advice 19/10. 
When doing a workout how do you approach survey when finishing but having to lower intensity in able to not stop/finish. All out?? Ftp is fine for vo2/endurance workouts but need to work on sweet spot.
