Apologies if this has already been asked.
I did a 1.6 VO2 session the other day (Grassy Ridge -3) which was really easy so I decided to increase the duration and power of many of the intervals. When completing the survey should I base my response on the original power levels, or the increased ones I completed?
Thanks
On the original workout. Today the system doesn’t give credit for increased intensity during a workout.
Recommendation: after an outside workout (with power data) and you associate it with the planned workout, it would be nice to receive a pop-up in your browser to add the level of effort. I had to look for it while I guess no one wants to forget about it. I also noticed that the LoE question doesn’t come up in the mobile app, but I reckon you are aware or it’s somewhere in the previous replies.
Thanks all re: persisting Progression Level issues. Looking into this with the team now!
It looks like the website data for Past Rides has joined the other platforms and gone a bit haywire now.
Workout Difficulty and Progression Changes are all over the place this morning, and an unexplained change in Progression Levels too.
Ticket submitted
Same situation with Android app @IvyAudrain : Android Calendar showing incorrect progression labels/numbers for completed workouts compared to the Web Calendar, which appears to be correct.
I’m also seeing differences between the android app and website workout pl numbers.
OPE, we’re hustling on a fix for the apps, for now, the current fix for PL consistencies only applies to the web.
Apologies for the confusion!
Just looked on the browser version. Looks great, well done. I even have PL’s attributed for some outdoor MTB rides from a couple months ago 
.
For the past two or three days the PL consistencies are all over the place on the web Past Rides page @IvyAudrain . I keep reading the web is fixed but i keep feeding back that this appears not to be the case.
The history of workout difficulty and primary progressions for completed workouts is all over the place. Breakthrough and Not Recommended difficulty for Productive rides, Progressions from 0 to 1 etc… when i have no PL’s near that level
The weird thing is my Progression Levels on the Career Page are correct.
This has all been fed back to Support.
Were they outdoor TR workouts or just random rides?
Random rides. Looks like I associated them with endurance rises of the same length and intensity so that is probably a key part. I did that retroactively when I got added to AT.
Just adding my voice to those having trouble with discrepancies between the web client and the applications with regards to increases in Progression Levels on certain workouts, as well as their classification as “achievable” or “stretch” etc. The Progression levels on my Career page are consistent between clients, but there is a big difference on the classification of individual workouts.
A question I have - which is the source of truth? For my training, should I believe the we client or the apps?
Secondly (sorry if this has been asked - 4000+ posts is a lot to get through), when choosing filler endurance rides, I should be choosing “Achievable” workouts, right? This won’t have a negative affect on my Progression Levels, will it?
Thanks! Cal.
Web is “truth”, you don’t go down on PL’s from doing achievable workouts.
Adaptive training got me good enough to hang with a cat 4 field after a 2 year hiatus from racing. Unfortunately it didn’t create any racing prowess since I was 24th in the field sprint lol
Thanks for the info 
I’m maintaining mine offline in a spreadsheet (inspired by someone else here doing the same). I agree, it would be nice if this was done by the app.
Sorry for the confusion, this issue in the discrepancy between web and apps was definitely a surprise so we’re hustling to fix it. This is the purpose of beta testing/inherent with any closed beta; to catch those weird bugs and issues before releasing to all of our athletes. Thanks for helping us test AT beta! 
@IvyAudrain just checking in for your opinion. My levels are now good on the web and everything appears to be working 
. My history however is all messed up with Difficulty ratings out the window and strange PL changes on prior workouts.
I’m not worried personally but should I persevere with support to get it fixed? Will it be messing with the ML and making it harder for AT to understand my progression?? Thoughts…
Quick question, with AT when would you do a Ramp Test. I am currently scheduled for tomorrow but my Threshold and Sweet Spot level are sitting just under 6. My Plan is to test……but maybe I should wait till my PL’s are above 8-9 ? Would like to get your thoughts.
