So why does Nate say nobody has mentioned the correct feature yet??? Can you imagine how excited he is reading all this speculation!
Where have you seen this?
I just hope the new feature is as exciting as the forum anticipation has been!
Adaptive workouts = thing 1?
Group workouts = thing 2?
Something like INSCYD = thing 3?
IMO, #3 would be the most valuable of these.
But all innovation is good. Keep building the feature set ![]()
![]()
This is all too well being lined up for April fools. Just saying.
Today is March 30… and I think they have calendars in Reno ![]()
What is the best of all options for monitoring these announcements ? Twitter, Instagram, Youtube? I want to get it while it’s hot ![]()
Simply building the climax for a day or so.
I’m sure he means noone has mentioned what they hinted at in the podcast, rather than guessing ‘thing 2’ at any point - I’m sure someone has got it with the number of posts here
Maybe - guess we’ll all find out soon!
Hopefully, I’ve been checking and rechecking for 8 hours ![]()
What’s clear here is that we really are what @dcrainmaker called cult-like followers lol and we’re like the nerds that speculate over the plots of the next comic book film!
it is today
I am sure it is group workouts based on recent Strava for @Nate_Pearson @Bryce. This will be awesome as in my past life I have used zwift group workouts.
If this is the case they need to implement a system to have connected friends as the current system via the teams tab on TR is not a solution. I am looking forward to it whatever it is.
Shoot me now, I missed that part ![]()
Well DCRainmaker said he’d "love to see TrainerRoad figure out how to increase their social interaction on the platform for those that want it. Whether it be recorded workouts by a handful of coaches, or ways for users to interact with each other."
So thats where my money is ![]()
I suspect that it is ‘self-altering’ workouts. Both @Nate_Pearson and @Jonathan have been uploading ‘broken’ or non-conforming workouts to strava recently
this is painfully true
![]()