Strava leaderboards no longer free

Some (me) are quite meh about Strava, but passionate about business strategy. Hence my interest.

2 Likes

That’s what I should’ve said: the free part is what’s valuable to me. There’s not $5 of value in the premium part now to me, but $5 isn’t a big ask. I’m just not lining up to pay.

4 Likes

Personally I’m pretty meh about Strava or the strategy, but find the emotional responses in here fascinating.

6 Likes

Something for everyone then. Even popcorn for some, apparently. Which I sorely lack - we have Covid-cancelled our Friday popcorn at the office.

Plus I’m not in the office either, so I’m really not getting popcorn.

1 Like

This also assumes most of the people complaining fall into this category rather than, like me, riding around on a 2nd hand bike they picked up at the local collective. Not everyone on here has that kind of dough to throw around, so ya, especially right now, putting stuff behind pay walls limits availability and pisses people off. Just sayin.

That being said, Strava made a reasonable business decision here by doing so. Whether the stuff now behind a pay wall is worth an extra $60/yr will depend on numerous factors specific to the individual. I have no beef with Strava on this one, just like I have no beef with anyone that thinks Strava is garbage or a gift from the gods. It’s nothing but a personal opinion either way.

2 Likes

Then they can go somewhere else, nobody is forcing anybody to use their app. Save your $5 and go use something free and see if it works better or worse for you.

1 Like

Hey I hear ya, I’m on a 2017 Giant Contend that I got for $500 and it’s a hunk of junk, but it’s a bike to ride. Two pairs of Black Bibs and a few POC jerseys I got on super sale. My comment was more of just poking fun. I like Strava because I like the layout, the social factor, the segments, and I have never really had any qualms about the route builder and that is even getting better with the latest update. So for that, I’ll gladly spend $7 a month.

I just always am interested in seeing the public’s reaction when apps or services start charging / charging more. It’s all about value to you. If you’re serious about cycling or that’s where most of your enjoyment comes from, and you REALLY like strava, then go to one less dinner per month, get one less starbucks, do one less whatever you normally do to afford that $7, plain and simple. It’s all about perspective and realizing worth. People get so bent of shape having to pay a little extra money for something they might very well literally use every single day (not even saying strava specifically). I think it’s absolutely hysterical the amount of arguing and whatnot I’ve seen on the internet over Strava this past week, just sitting back and taking it all in. If you like it, pay for it. If you don’t, then go somewhere else.

2 Likes

Don’t you ride ENVE wheels?

6 Likes

Sure, pass judgment and toss some stones my way…

Yes I have a set of ENVE wheels and they are awesome. One wheel has been replaced 2 times under warranty. The back story is my mom gave me $$ after my dad died. Negotiated a fantastic deal and used those $$ on the wheels. Think of my dad every time I look at them. Lifetime warranty and no weight limit. Very happy with that purchase on many levels.

Is that good enough or do you want to see our personal balance sheet? Want me to discuss all the purchases we don’t make? How much we save? How we defer a lot of purchases until we get the best deal? Or do you just want to use one purchase in an attempt to discredit what I said?

:popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn:

6 Likes

Very well said. And definitely agree. There is somewhat of an inclination for people to jump straight to outrage, and as this thread has shown emotions can often derail legitimate disagreements about how things ā€œshouldā€ be and what is ā€œrightā€ vs. ā€œwrongā€. At the end of the day, we are all in this together and petty arguments shouldn’t detract from the fact we are all chasing the best version of ourselves we can be. That get’s lost in the BS a lot of the time.

1 Like

Sheesh. No need to get so damn defensive. Just thought your quote was a bit funny and ironic given that you have a set a wheels that cost more than a lot of peoples bikes. Go for a ride and relax dude.

2 Likes

LOL, couldn’t help myself, just a little poke back.

And yes, I agree it does seem a bit ironic :smiley:

2 Likes

The only thing I don’t like about this topic is certain people calling others cheapskates, freeloaders, freeriders, whatever. They are pejorative terms. Strava offered everybody a product. Strava agreed to sell our data and all that but they have obviously failed in their business initiatives.

Strava has often been buggy. They seem directionless as a company. The add premium features. They remove them with no notice. They change the plans offerings every year or two.

In any case people aren’t cheapskates if they don’t want to send donations to Strava for premium features they don’t need. So now that we have this change, people can decide if they want to do pay or not.

Supposedly Strava implemented something a month or two ago but I haven’t personally noticed evidence of it.

Bingo - all of the above.

No reason to go anywhere else until Strava folds. The basics are still offered for free.

Honestly Strava should just charge everybody $1/month. If 10M of their 50M users paid $1/month that would give them $120M per year in revenue. $1/mo. would make them super profitable.

5 Likes

So i guess the answer here is ā€œno oneā€.

3 Likes

Kudos for use of the phrase ā€œpersonal balance sheetā€, bbarrera - a quick search says it’s the first time it’s been used on this forum. :trophy:

Commonly, those who maintain a personal balance sheet tend to have a good relationship with money and their finances. All power to you. :+1: :sunglasses:

慤
NB Excellent thread!

2 Likes

B-money won’t $teer you wrong :money_mouth_face:

I use Strava way more than Netflix personally

4 Likes

Actively or passively?

After watching GPlamas video… Strava really didn’t remove all that much for free users… seemed a lot worse at first. (this probably speaks to the need to dramatize things the by relevant media and us and/or bad communication on Stravas side)

The majority of things people use day to day still seem to be available for free :man_shrugging:t2:
(of course this might be different for everyone)

1 Like

He also addressed the ā€œvalueā€ gripe…as you stated:

Some people may have business/commerce interests tied to their strava account so it makes sense to pony up the sub fee. Others, such as myself, used the platform in a very peripheral manner, making the fee unreasonable.

As GPLama summarized for the free sub;

  • You can’t see anything more than Top 10 Overall and Top 10 Women segment times.
  • You can’t see all of your previous Segment times/attempts.

This is the only thing I used strava for, so my ā€œday to dayā€ usage is 100% effected. Not only that, but I had to self-police the segments regarding valid/invalid results. I was ok with this because the function was free. Crappy, but free. Now it’s just crappy.

Again, comes down to personal valuation, which, it seems lies anywhere from -100 to +100.