Workout alternates doesn't show the most obvious alternates

Next week the Ai suggests that I increase my Thursday SS workout from 1:30 to 1:45 and do Eclipse +1 at 8.0 WL. Given that I for most of my base phase self selected 2 hour SS workouts instead of the 1:30 prescribed to increase weekly volume I thought I might aswell go check alternates for a 2 hour workout next week aswell. The alternates I’m presented confuse me a bit.

For longer alternates I’m given five sugestions, three of them are not reccomended. Only one is a 2:00 workout, the rest are longer, and that one is one of the not reccomended. That workout is Wright Peak, SS 9.4. Looking at TRs collection of workouts there are 39 other 2:00 workouts from the first 8.0 workout until you reach Wright Peak. Why are none of them listed as a suitable alternate?

I get that some of them are excluded since they are hard start intervals, but even if you only count workouts without a single second above FTP there are still 16 left.

1 Like

There is currently a bug that shows some of those workouts as “Not Recommended.”

In terms of why some other workouts aren’t included, I don’t know exactly how we classify workouts as suitable alternates, but I do know that we don’t include them all, and the workouts have to meet the specific criteria of the plan.

There are six sub-categories of sweet spot workouts, for example, and we’re only looking at the ones that fit in with your plan.

1 Like

There are multiple alternates that most definitely are in the same sub-category which aren’t shown as an alternate.

Looking at the longer alternates again I see that there are only one listed for each duration 2:00, 2:15, 2:30 etc. Might I suggest that the new limit on how many alternates that are presented makes it unnecessarily difficult to find the best alternate.

For my specific example, instead of seeing a 3:00 workout when I want a bit longer than 1:45, why not show workouts like Eclipse +3 (4x20 instead of 3x25) or Atitlan (3x31)? And if Wright Peak (3x30 at 90, 92 and 90%) is a reccomended alternate why not Three Fools -1 (3x30 all at 90%)?

Again, I don’t actually know how we classify things or how we select which workouts to show, so I’ll forward this to the team as I agree, and I think it’s good feedback.

1 Like