Stride - Alex Dowsett

Any one tried it?

https://stride.is

Alex Dowsett co-founder.

1 Like

I like Alex Dowsett based on his personality on podcasts and TV, but the info available on that website is very sparse. Maybe the website isn’t fully made yet, but when I click on links that seem like they should give details, I just get a sign-up page. There’s nowhere near enough info available. It’s easy to say that you have AI FTP estimation and great data analysis…

The comparison table is at best rather subjective, possibly disingenuous too, which raises red flags for me. I certainly wouldn’t agree with some of their assessments of TrainerRoad.

2 Likes

The screenshots certainly don’t depict a ā€œbest in classā€ set of analysis tools at all.

I wonder where they think the product slots in. There are a few platforms like Vekta that aim to replace TrainingPeaks. Their plans make it seem that they are eying TrainerRoad instead. They seem to be aiming higher than low-, mid- and high-volume of yore (going off of their documentation). They seem to base their training off of classic TP/Coggan metrics (they write e. g. TS, but I wonder whether they do this to avoid copyright issues).

What I don’t understand is what they are doing differently and better than the competition. IMHO they seem late to the party:

  • TR has a huge dataset and moved on from a static training plans.
  • Vekta tries to supplant TP and bases their business model around coached athletes. Edit: Stride is also meant for coached athletes, thanks @JoPage.
  • Wouldn’t it be better if they sold their training plans on TP and Vekta?

I really like Alex Dowsett, but this doesn’t seem like a sensible business venture to me.

I find that infuriating and they are shooting themselves in the foot. Why not show off your functionality to convince me to sign up?

2 Likes

Interesting. I like Alex Dowsett

I think they will have a hard job of converting TR fans, however, they may snag mew users and disgruntled TR users looking for something that doesn’t quite fit in the TR model.

The notable things they are selling that are different

  1. FTP for running

  2. potentially more input and feedback from the AI system

  3. a cheaper price point

  4. use of HRV data…..which some people seem to want

  5. Coaching integration

2 Likes

As it’s got a 30 day trial and you don’t have put in CC details I signed up, looks interesting. the FTP detection is like Xert, it’s ongoing rather than once a momth, all looks polished, not tried putting in a plan yet, but the change log stopped in June after weekly updates

I suppose they have just been doing under the hood enhancements

1 Like

I hadn’t seen that this morning. I gotta correct my earlier post.

I’m skeptical, it seems to me a combination of sleep data (longer-term averages of sleep duration, etc.) and subjective metrics (how have you slept/do you feel?) do at least as good a job.

But they are hardly the only ones here to use HRV in readiness and recovery metrics.

There is a load of information available.

See the document pages, for example…

Guess they want people to create an account though

I didn’t find any of that info from the main site. So maybe my observation should be ā€œinfo not made available sufficiently obviously for dummies like me!ā€ :slight_smile:

And whilst I’m sure they want people to create accounts, I’m not going to sign up for something just to figure out whether it’s something worth signing up to.

4 Likes

That is a fair comment.

There are supposedly Ai generated workouts…

I just tried it…

ā€œ90 minutes session with 40 minutes of work at thresholdā€

It came up with 3 reps of various lengths and gave a range of 95- 103% of FTP.

The FTP and run threshold estimates seen accurate for me
(TR under estimated, then was almost spot on, then over estimated over three AiFTP cycles)

I like it, but would I pay for it? Not sure. Is it enough value.

The runs stuff is way ahead of TR imo.

Swim isn’t finished yet by the look of it

It seems a good offering for triathletes.

3 Likes

It seems pretty good tbh

The FTP estimate is about the same as my coaches estimate, and about the same a TR was before I left a month or so ago.

If I go back to self coaching at some point then I wouldnt blindly rule this out, that’s for sure. The workout creator seems like a good thing too.

Certainly one for TR to watch…if they get a foothold, they could present a bit of competition

1 Like

Is it?
I’m only asking, because I cannot really see what features they have. I only learnt in this thread that running is supported. On the homepage, I could only find it in the table comparing Stride with e. g. TP and TR, in the documentation, I found a mention of ā€œrunning thresholdā€.

Not saying the functionality isn’t there, I’m saying I don’t know what functionality is there. The homepage … isn’t helping them win customers over.

Does it? I am really asking. Right now they only seem to offer training plans for cyclists, but no training plans that combine cycling with running (and swimming).

Perhaps this is a case where a (human) coach needs to work with the athlete — or the athlete themselves needs to pick the right workouts.

I wish they would make that clear and explain without me having to create an account.

1 Like

It has got promise but needs a bit of work / refinement. Giving it some credit it was only released a few days ago.
I will be interest to see how it works when they implement swims

Generated today run in about 14 seconds (8 with 6x pickups, based on my threshold that it detected)

Looks like they are working on the principle of coaches and athletes creating and sharing workouts and plans, although I’m not really sure. You can create and share both plans and workouts i.e make them public

Also a free option

Its right in the middle of the menu on the home page :slight_smile:

I agree its not clear that all the support information is in DOCs though.

Re: Runs

  • I think so, it has correctly given my my RUN threshold (and bike and HR), looking at my history it seems to correctly track up and down (I did wonder if it just read from my Garmin account but it doesn’t as there are small differences.)
  • You can quickly create run workouts (or bike with the ai workout dialogue, see post above)
  • The training load numbers look correct and the load chart is doing a good job, Green, Yellow, Red
  • Its also given me my heart rate threshold.

Correct at this time, Alex has said this is coming. You or your coach can create your own workouts and plans at the moment. I am wondering if they are hoping coaches will create and share plans a bit like Interval.icu

Copyright issues, I think you are correct on this.

RE: Zones there are presets and you can create your own (its not just the Coggan zones.)
Bike Presets: Coggan 7 zones, Sweet spot 5 zones, Polarised 3 zones
Run Presets: Daniels 5-Zone Pace, McMillan 7-Zone Pace
HR Presets: Karvonen 5-Zone Heart Rate, Polarized 3-Zone Heart Rate

Overall, I think its a good start but totally agree the sales pitch is a bit lacking, it should at least point-out there is a lot of detail in the documents section (which it doesn’t even mention, unless I missed it)

2 Likes

On my phone (iPhone, using Chrome) I just don’t have a menu like that at all. At the top I just have this:

So perhaps it’s just a website bug / design issue. Regardless of whether it’s my dumbness or the website being not optimal, it would probably help them to make the info a bit more prominent.

As I say, I like Alex on a human level, and I think that a bit of competition is always a good thing. I’ve not seen anything yet to tempt me from TrainerRoad, but am interested to hear of people’s experiences.

1 Like

Hi everyone. Really appreciate the kind words on me and the feedback on Stride, we need it! The Trainerroad business is a titan and a real source of inspiration to us, especially the committed community it has, much like the British TT scene.

To answer your comments, yes, the homepage does not tell you enough, especially the phone web page. We’ve been working away at what’s after sign up features and product that works has been the sole aim before launch (we’re 2 weeks into being live now). We didn’t anticipate simply signing up being a big barrier to entry as we don’t ask for any credit card details or hold back any part of the platform either for 30 days.

We aren’t targeting replacing anyone specifically, there’s room in this industry for many platforms and everyone has their preference and there’s some great stuff out there!

We want to make coaches lives more efficient and easier with coach led AI tools, the goal is that they can focus on the important bit which is the human to human contact. But we also recognise human coaching is unaffordable to many which is why we have the tools in place for someone to feel like they’re maximising their training. There is a big training plans update coming soon to run alongside the existing plans.

The comparison work is born from my wish one day to have a real time view of where Ganna was pulling away from me and where i’d hold him, (much like race car games on the playstation where you could get a ghost view of your own pb or the fastest time by someone else to use as reference) then that way I can analyse how did I on climbs and descents compared to him, and cornering as well, the real interesting part I’d be keen on seeing is gradient transition, who’s fighting the deceleration as you go from a -ve to a +ve gradient better than others. BUT this is all based on him being willing to learn from others also, it’s a ā€˜give to get’ scenario with your files. But for team managers this could be super insightful to give points of improvement over just physiology.

Lastly on the comparison stuff as there was some skepticism to it I believe, the ability to view a group ride, TTT or race as a team event as well the individual aspect to it is important. being able to see the story of the race in data form as well as getting it from the riders direct, its how I’ve used it for some pro racing I’ve had to dig into.

Anyways I could ramble on, but enjoyed seeing you guys chatting about us over here at Stride, Thank you :folded_hands:.

Alex D

24 Likes

I’m glad to hear that. It’d really help to have a few pages where you explain what the product can do with sample data and such.

In my experience it helps to figure out areas where (at least you think) your product is better than the competition. Given the enormous size difference between you and the competition, you likely want this competition to be asymmetric in some fashion.

In your post, you explain the importance of good data analysis. Here, you likely have TR beaten hands-down, and your competition is likely something like TP. When I was still racing, I’d subscribe to TP just for its analysis tools.

One more question: do you plan on offering coaching services through your app? That might be a good way to dog food your app, you’ll scratch your own itches much more quickly than those of others.