Quick one… what do people think is likely to be the more difficult of these two? Asking as I (stupidly) subbed in Priest +2 last week as I was feeling pretty tired, but I suspect that what I was originally supposed to do was probably the easier option.
Priest +2 - 5 x 30 seconds at 150%, 12 minutes at 95%
Clark - 6 x 12 seconds at 200%, 8 minutes at 88-94%
I’m leaning towards the former being tougher because of more time spent close to FTP without a break.
I’m wondering if Wrangell - 2 x 30 seconds at 150%, 29 minutes at 94% might be the better follow up this week (assuming I’m feeling well rested). Another option which might be slightly more achievable is Redoubt -1 - 2 x 30 seconds at 150%, 29 minutes at 92%.
Edit - Interestingly the Adaptive Training system seems to think that Clark (9.4) is harder than Redoubt -1 (9.3), but I’d much rather do those slightly tougher (but much shorter) hard starts with an 8 minute interval than do a 29 minute interval!
LOL this reminded me of an old 80s song from Laurie Anderson “Smoke Rings”
La primera pregunta es: Que es mas macho, pineapple o knife?
Well, let’s see.
My guess is that a pineapple is more macho than a knife.
Si! Correcto! Pineapple es mas macho que knife.
La segunda pregunta es: Que es mas macho, lightbulb o schoolbus?
Uh, lightbulb?
No! Lo siento, Schoolbus es mas macho que lightbulb.
Gracias. And we’ll be back in un momento.
Right now I’d rather do The Priest +2 and to be honest I like both formats. Not sure which one is mas macho guess I think of Clark as more of an early-mid base workout and The Priest as a late base workout.
and to be honest I like both formats. Not sure which one is mas macho 
guess I think of Clark as more of an early-mid base workout and The Priest as a late base workout.