No worries. Amberās replied with some info. ![]()
Is the Adaptive Training version of the app more hardware / computing (whatever the correct term is) heavy? And if so, is it possible to have the AT running your plans on one device, and will that reflect correctly as planned workouts change?
I think this is key, and hopefully coming soon.
Being able to go into plan builder and say I have a race on X date and I generally have 1hr on Mondays, 2hrs on Tuesdays, 1hr weds, no time on Thursday, 1hr on Friday morning and 3hrs each on sat/sun⦠And you plug it in and it spits out a plan that then constantly adapts under those criteria. Current plan builder is close, but could be better with regards to time constraints/allotment.
Sounds like the real computing work takes place on the TR side with whatever systems they have. Our local apps seem to be essential the same demand, since they are simply pulling the information from the TR side.
So it will be the same info on all of your devices (assuming they are all up to date with the AT related views).
You guys think thereās negative feedback in the DJ thread nowā¦just wait!
āAT said Iād be at a 269 watt ftp by July. I only skipped 30% of the workouts, slept 5hrs a night, did all my training fasted, supplemented with zwift racesā¦and Iām only at 250 watts! I want my $75 back!ā
Yes, youāll have the same info available on mobile as on desktop, and all updates/adaptations will sync accordingly.
That makes sense.
Iāll have to update at some point to be able to run Group Workouts when that comes to mobile, but Iām excited to use AT as soon as possible
.
With adaptive training, I will not only share my training data with Trainerroad, I will also label each of my workout activity to allow Trainerroad train their model. This data is invaluable. Services are usually free if I provide training data for Machinelearning. Are the subscription fees still reasonable?
You really think thatās true? Services are free when they use your data for multiple purposes (including sharing or selling with third parties, driving ads, and more)ānot just because theyāre using it to train a model that you will also benefit from. If you think the subscription fee isnāt reasonable, you can always leave TR and try your luck with Zwiftās ātraining plans.ā
This āif you use my data I shouldnāt have to pay for your serviceā mindset is trash.
This all sounds really cool, but if youāre someone like me who does a plan so I donāt have to think about what workout Iām going to do when I get on my trainer, someone who doesnāt analyse their workouts, someone that just letās TR do all the thinking for me, will we notice any difference?
Also, I always do a low volume plan to leave time for fun rides, sometime I move my Saturday ride to a Sunday, will the the AT change that workout to allow for an extra days rest on the Saturday?
Who can guarantee that the data is not used for multiple purposes in the future? No one can tell now as to who might access the data (authorised or not) or how it will be used in future.
Nice side step ![]()
Anyway you now seem to be questioning the adequacy of data protection legislation and privacy notices. Perhaps start a separate thread.
They mentioned in the podcast that they will apply the (strict) GDPR privacy rules globally.
I think this is the answer to your question @Wirt
Have you checked the Train Now thread? More of how it works is explained there. New Feature - TrainNow
Iām hoping that is what AT will turn the TrainNow feature into. Right now, I have the same question. It offers 3 workouts of varying intensities regardless of the day or fatigue. Been checking since it came to the Beta to see how the workout suggestions compare to my plan, but it also leaves the rider to decide. I think that Nate had mentioned that the survey data is needed before it would start suggesting recovery weeks/days so this might be a future iteration.
Canāt wait to get this. Been with TR since 2018 and this is a game changer. Just started a new position within my company and it would be great to see how this adapts my training plan. --Iāll sit here and refresh my inbox till I get my notice
@Nate_Pearson PAHLEEASE let me in
![]()
Wouldnāt bother, the question of what the roll out is going to look like has been asked loads and not answered. So I donāt expect it to happen soon. The cynic in me thinks this was a bit of a stunt to hush the Dylan Thomas video.
Hey weāve got this great thing coming but hey you canāt use it and we canāt even give you a potential timescale. Could be months. As it could drive new subscriptions I think it would be ethical to set some expectations.
You sure about that? That would be horrible. More wait time. Plan builder is for me as useful as a one-legged man in a ass-kicking contest. ![]()
![]()
Thatās true no whether they are using it for machine learning or not. Totally different issue. Trying to tie it to the price is crazy. If anything they should charge more because of the extra cost and hassle of protecting your data appropriately.