How can there be a recommendation without knowing the intensity of the ride? If it is a race or a hard ride, I can see the case for >60g. Otherwise it seems the rider is not adapted.
Intensity matters little in determining fueling needs. In fact highest intensities probably merit tempered fueling approaches to prevent GI distress. For virtually all on this forum, fueling the entire kcal burn of their training with carbohydrate is impossible because most folks burn upwards of 400kcal per hour and won’t do 100g/hr. The average power to burn 60g of carbs per hour on the bike is very very low. And it’s be best possible time to maximize glycogen repletion due to higher glut4 activity.
The problem is you can have days worth of energy stored in fat, but once you blow through the ~2k calories worth of glycogen, it won’t matter, your body won’t let you continue. You can never run completely on fat. Regardless of the IF
I could be mistaken, but just looking at my history, the fitter I get, the more I can ride at my aerobic threshold (LT1) without being so carb dependent. Take today’s 2650cal ride as an example. I ate:
Normal meal the night before at 7:30pm
Breakfast: A bit of pasta, an apple and tea with cream. = 50g carbs
During the ride: 2 Sis Bars + 2 Sis Gels + 1 banana = 110g of carbs
According to your measurements 60g * 5 hours = 300g. And you think that’s underdosing!!. That is waayy too much for me. I ended up the ride feeling ok, with enough juice to do one 925w sprint right at end of the ride. I haven’t been riding for that long, so in a sense I’m probably average at best. If want to do more SST or threshold during the ride, I certainly need to get closer to 1/2 of your recommendations.
I’m not sure there is a mismatch - its totally possible to finish rides that you’ve under fueled. I don’t know that anyone is saying it isn’t possible. It is easier to do this the lower the intensity - for an endurance ride like you linked your RPE will go up, your recovery will take longer and be less efficient, and your overall progress may be put at risk. But it is possible, just not advised
I take most of my fuel from my drink, but in truth I should eat more. Until my fingertip nerves grow back it’s a bit hard grabbing food on the go though. I usually carry a banana but of late I’ve not been using that on 2-3 hour rides. If it’s a longer ride I’ll force myself to eat a bit of banana every 25miles and probably have a bar to back it up and maybe an emergency gel.
That’s >1000kcal MORE than 300g carbs provides. I’d target 90g/hr for that ride, at least.
Your sprint power may thank you.
We had a saying in my PhD program. “Carbs for the RFD”
RFD = Rate of Force Development.
We used it as an excuse as power athletes to overeat kcal and carbs, but the truth behind the statement is that if you want high peak power output or high supra-threshold power output of any kind, you need a high-carb diet. No better time than during training. Might be the most critical time for muscle retention too, which is key for maximizing 1-60s power.
No need to eat solid food for maximizing performance. FYI. Saving Money as an Endurance Athlete. Totally can eat to fuel. But not needed so don’t feel like you’re missing out on anything.
Nutritional intake can influence exercise metabolism and performance, but there is a lack of research comparing protein-rich pre-exercise meals with endurance exercise performed both in the fasted state and following a carbohydrate-rich breakfast. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of three pre-exercise nutrition strategies on metabolism and exercise capacity during cycling. On three occasions, seventeen trained male cyclists (VO2peak 62.2 ± 5.8 mL·kg−1·min−1, 31.2 ± 12.4 years, 74.8 ± 9.6 kg) performed twenty minutes of submaximal cycling (4 × 5 min stages at 60%, 80%, and 100% of ventilatory threshold (VT), and 20% of the difference between power at the VT and peak power), followed by 3 × 3 min intervals at 80% peak aerobic power and 3 × 3 min intervals at maximal effort, 30 min after consuming a carbohydrate-rich meal (CARB; 1 g/kg CHO), a protein-rich meal (PROTEIN; 0.45 g/kg protein + 0.24 g/kg fat), or water (FASTED), in a randomized and counter-balanced order. Fat oxidation was lower for CARB compared with FASTED at and below the VT, and compared with PROTEIN at 60% VT. There were no differences between trials for average power during high-intensity intervals (367 ± 51 W, p = 0.516). Oxidative stress (F2-Isoprostanes), perceived exertion, and hunger were not different between trials. Overall, exercising in the overnight-fasted state increased fat oxidation during submaximal exercise compared with exercise following a CHO-rich breakfast, and pre-exercise protein ingestion allowed similarly high levels of fat oxidation. There were no differences in perceived exertion, hunger, or performance, and we provide novel data showing no influence of pre-exercise nutrition ingestion on exercise-induced oxidative stress.