As you said. “We focus on athletes with goals and making them faster, whether they race or not”
Totally agree with Trainer Roads focus on making athletes faster. It just seems that focus is pointed primarily at racing. Racing is the top of the “competitive spectrum” no doubt. I just wondered if TR had any idea of how many users actually pin on numbers vs those of us who use the platform for other reasons. I know way more cyclist who dont race than do. Just seems the non racers would be a big market if there was a way to incorporate them in a more meaningful manner. Im never going to be competitive to race but I do train so I can do big things (for me) on a bike. Whether its trying to keep up with Club rides, bike pack for a week, do Everestings or week long tour in Italy, there are so many other things to do on a bike that require training to get the best out of one s self.
" building features that serve the most athletes"
I guess thats what my original post was getting at. Are most of the users actively racing or are there a bunch of us club riders just trying to be the best we can be?
“full gas on building out AT functionality”
Yall are doing a great job. Just some thinking out loud on my part.
Just seems to really get granular, you would really want to know exactly what we are training for so the ML could see what training does for across these non race outcomes.