I’m using a training plan from TR for a Gran Fondo in October and another in March and have used the high volume/aggressive approach as we have plenty of time to train and recover with our lifestyle as it currently is. My question pertains to the large body of evidence I’m finding that suggests that even when training for durations totaling over 12-15 Hrs/week there is greater benefits to be had in training a maximum of twice per week in high intensity training zones, with the remainder being low intensity zone 2 training. TR has me doing 3 X high intensity sessions per week and very little zone 2 training. From what I’m reading and listening to the evidence suggests that this is far too much high intensity and far too little low intensity.
I’m looking for confidence in the TR AI approach but keep reading/hearing/watching that the training plan I’m being given by the software may work but is far from optimal.
Probably because Z2 isn’t a magic bullet? Volume drives improvement (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39390310/); for a time crunched athlete (most TR users) intervals and high intensity work is going to achieve far more volume per unit time than riding Z2.