Exactly.
Huh,
. Arenât we training physiological systems at/or percentages of our FTP depending on the seasonâs training periodization and the workoutâs intended goals? Iâm not sure people are trying to dial in on the trainerâŚ
I reserve those skills when Iâm outside and focus on improving my power indoors, but maybe Iâm just doing it wrong, I hear what youâre saying, your point is interesting and Iâll take it under consideration.
FWIW my indoor time is also focused on pedaling smoothness and controlling power during transitions.
I do 90%+ of my time on the bike on the trainer in erg mode. I have gotten several unsolicited comments that they love my pulls because Iâm rock steady on pacing and an easy wheel to follow. If ERG made it so you couldnât control power this wouldnât be the case. Seems silly.
This is actually an important skill and also in regards to controlling unnecessary spikes when accelerating. Watch the crit videos @Nate_Pearson posted and you can see the difference in smoothness of the more and less experienced riders in both the race speed and their pedal stroke.
FWIW this thread prompted me to listen to TDâs podcast last night (I have a 2.5hr commute so why not?). Heâs not particularly adept at explaining himself, but much of his reasoning seems sound. His breakaway riding tips were actually interesting and better than most similar segments Iâve listened too, and I like his take on FTP obsession and the coaching business. Watts for $$$.
I was prepared to write him off and his style isnât really for me, but the guy is extremely earnest and obviously passionate about what heâs doing. Heâs also very clearly qualified to give race advice and spoke well to the amateur level athleteâs situation. Wonât be in my regular podcast rotation but Iâll take a look now and then.
Not sure anyone was debating it wasnât. The disagreement was with somehow that using ERG over the winter would somehow diminish oneâs ability to do so.
This is obviously not an argument someone is going to âwinâ. Think of it as a different perspective.
Envision an effort that is really hard. Assume your FTP is 350. And you want to simulate a real world situation on a short hill climb at the end of a race. Everyone is attacking. Legs are tired from the race, and legs are tired from the week. The effort puts you on the edge of blowing up. You need to do everything in your power to not go over the numbers (to not blow) and you need to hit the numbers to hang with the group.
These are the sort of situations that Tom trains and he simulates this in his workouts. He gives this stuff on tired legs, at the end of a workout, and the end of a hard week. I need to control my power (myself) in order to not blow. If I used ERG, I would just put my head down and stamp out the power. The machine would rail me right into the power.
3 mins seated 400w @ 90 rpm
20 secs Standing 425w 80 rpm
10 secs easy
3â of this alternating back and forth
30 sec Standing 400w @ 80 rpm
1 min Seated 330w @ 70 rpm
But in the real world, in a race, that is not how it works. You need to be able to make the power, control the power yourself, control the surges so you donât go too hard (and blow), and recover at a strong number to hang with the group.
This is not about right and wrong. But perspective. If your training simulates real world situations, you cannot use ERG to simulate the real world. Look at all the transitions in that effort - high/low cadence, sitting/standing. This effort is designed to train power control and transition control. These are skills and you cannot learn them if the machines does them for you. Tom teaches these skills which is one of the many reasons we cannot use ERG.
But if your goal is to pull steady in a group Iâm sure ERG is a great tool.
Hint. You can shift for transitions in ERG mode I would for that scenario.
Not saying it is better or worse, I am just not seeing a good case not to. You hit your cadence targets. Boom. Done
That seems like a really specialist scenario. Are you doing those sorts of sessions all year, or only in building up to specific climbing events?
Personally, I donât do road racing (TTs, UK Hill Climbs, maybe some 'cross), so itâs a complete irrelevance to me.
You donât get to pick your pace in a race. You go as hard as they go until one of you blows up. Knowing how to control your power doesnât come into it. You spin the pedals as fast as it takes to hold the wheel. If that blows you up câest la vie. Better luck next time. If it blows them up⌠off you go.
Power is power. Race craft is race craft. We build power on the trainer and race craft in races.
Of course not. Thinking it is about âwinningâ the argument misses of the overall point available.
This is about tools for training and using them in ways to make us faster. There is no single ârightâ answer for everyone. There are proâs and conâs to each choice, and acting like one is totally superior to the others is a mistake.
Not everyone needs the same thing due to so many variables they arenât worth listing. The ideal is to recognize each option for what they do/donât offer, and consider using them with regard to your own fitness and training needs.
In a perfect world, we would mix and match to gain the best from any and all options. It is very rare in life that doing only one thing is the best answer, and I feel that applies here. ERG has great benefits, but so does Resistance mode. Mix it up to gain from each, and if nothing else, add a little variety into your training.
The premise here is that we somehow need to simulate race situations in every training session, and if weâre not simulating a race situation during training then weâre not getting the most out of the session.
This is, again, nonsense. Weâre training for physiological adaptations. The ability to push watts. Every racer on the planet knows if you want to know how to read a race, decide whether to chase a break, find the optimal point to attack a group⌠you have to go race. None of that stuff applies in ANY training situation.
If the idea is that thereâs some sort of technique to changing into a harder gear or spinning up your cadence in a single gear, um⌠TD is going to have to come with some sort of evidence if he wants to make those claims because anyone whoâs been racing for more than a month can realize that is absolute lunacy.
Not every session but one of the advantages of doing some hard group rides or races on Zwift now and then over the winter as part of your training is it keeps these skills sharp. Zwift has its limits but it does do a pretty good job of simulating the basic physical and mental dynamics of riding in a fast group if you find the right group even though it is totally missing the bike handling aspects.
Sure, you can get in great shape doing 100% Erg mode but if you throw some dynamic riding in there too (Zwift or outside) you are going to be better off come spring.
As for shifting being so simple it needs no practice I donât know where you are coming from. Sure, it is second nature for most of us but it is still a skill, particularly when riding at the limit, and it does degrade if not practiced under stress. I donât know about you but after 6 months of not shifting while in my drops at 30 mph, I am not as crisp at finding and hitting that lever as I was in my last race last season.
Fair, but a couple fast early season group rides should sort this out. Itâs not something you need to keep on top of all winter or risk losing the ability to remember how to do itâŚ
It also isnât what TD is claiming. He isnât saying his âpower controlâ makes your fingers better at shifting.
So what youâre saying is that itâs just like⌠riding a bike?
Iâm listening to the Danielson podcast episode now and Iâm wondering if the âPower Controlâ thing applies when using a power meter + powermatch. From what I gather, Tom says erg mode makes you have perfect power even when you canât hold it. But with powermatch (in my experience using powermeter and smart trainer) I have to hold the power or it fluctuates. My graphs arenât smooth, neither are they wildly fluctuating.
Isnât this why TR recommends turning off smoothing? So we can see what weâre really doing?
Iâm going to try using standard mode tonight to see if thereâs any difference (aside from just having to shift gears to manage cadence and power).
- That is entirely untrue. ERG mode is not magic and does not give âperfect powerâ. It takes time to adjust the resistance to match any change in rider cadence input, and that leads to fluctuation in power output, no different than doing a workout in Resistance.
- ERG takes over the primary duty of setting the power, but it is not perfect and is reactive (not proactive) to the rider input (cadence). So, in order to have the best results with ERG, you need to supply steady cadence input.
- See an example of a steady-state ERG workout that still shows plenty of subtle variation. Roughly 10 minutes from my CycleOps H2. It is NOT perfect, even though I hold a smooth cadence for the majority of the intervals.
- Note, exclude the low cadence drops that are me shifting in the big ring and doing standing breaks at lower cadence.
- Here is the real info on what PowerMatch really is and does.
- You arenât really controlling power any differently when using PowerMatch or not.
- You are still responsible for the same input (cadence).
- The main difference when introducing PowerMatch, is that there is an additional equation running in the background.
- That calculation identifies the difference between the power meter and smart trainer (a power delta or offset) and uses that known difference to adjust trainer resistance with the goal of setting the power target based on the power meter.
- First, understand that the smoothing setting in TR ONLY controls the visibility of the numeric power shown in the âActual Powerâ above the âTarget Powerâ.
- It DOES NOT affect any of the graphing or full data output.
- It is only used to slow down the variability that can be seen in power meters and smart trainers, so people donât lose their minds trying to hold power, and seeing it bounce around wildly.
- The final graph and power recorded are at the standard interval (1 per second?), so it has no impact on the overall workout. It is only used to sooth our wild minds and the desire to have âsteadyâ output.
Thatâs how I understand things to work @mcneese.chad , which makes me think that Tom doesnât really fully understand how TR worksâŚ
âŚor is looking for a way to get attention, which he admits to in the podcast.
Yup, I agree, he seems to be making this sensational and provocative on purpose. I think he either doesnât understand the reality of ERG or (more likely) is purposefully slanting his take on it to get to whatever impact or goal he has in mind.
I think heâs quite smart, but setting a view on this topic that is too narrowly focused and misses the full benefits that can be used well.
It feels like a grift to me⌠is he trying to drum up interest in a new book?
