I’m trying to find my unicorn gravel bike. It’s not a race bike but I will do races on it. I don’t want huge tire clearance because it messes with the geometry and bike handling. And downtube storage is a must.
The short list.
- Factor Aluto: almost perfect. But it’s really heavy, and the downtube storage is incredibly small that it’s basically useless. The chainstay is 425 which is a little too long as well. Same with the wheelbase. But it’s mostly the terrible downtube storage that I’m not liking. Round seatpost is a plus.
- Incolor Voyager: Again, so close to perfect. UDH, T47 BB, round seatpost, short chainstay at 415 is perfect, clears 45s, lightweight, great value. But they need a bigger size. I could probably make the 57 work but if they went one size bigger it would fit better. But also, no downtube storage is a big drawback.
- ENVE Fray: Love the geometry, new colors look stunning, and downtube storage is great. But it’s a bit expensive. The seatpost is proprietary which is a bummer, should have just gone with round. 40mm tire clearance is probably fine, 42 would be perfect. Non-removable FD hanger is not great.
So is there a bike that combines these 3 into the perfect gravel do it all bike? BSA or T47, UDH, downtube storage, clears 42-45mm tires (max 45), shorter chainstays, round seatpost, integrated cables.
Cervelo Aspero 5 seems to check all your boxes except the round seatpost.
1 Like
Ooh, haven’t really looked at it much but might be a good tip.
A Cannondale Synapse might be an option.
There are practically two types of downtube storage. 1) You can cram your tools and a tube in there (the Factor Aluto, Cannondale Synapse) 2) You can cram tools, tube, a jacket, and a small burrito (Specialized Diverge). Understand how you plan on using the storage before you make it a requirement.
You’re complaining about a 425mm chainstay when a 410mm chainstay is a standard road bike now. I’ve got a Trek Checkpoint that allows me to move the rear chainstay 15mm fairly easily. You’d be hard pressed to tell the difference unless you’re doing 4mph u-turns up a single track climb. It really only makes a difference in tight turns at parking lot speeds. I wouldn’t let it affect your choice.
1 Like
From prior experience, it is very noticeable to me. Hence why I weigh it in my decision. It’s not just the chainstay length, but it generally follows that longer chainstay bikes have longer wheelbases and usually slacker front ends. All of which I am not a fan of. The Crux was probably the closest to the perfect bike but I want downtube storage and hidden cables. And all the rumors of the upcoming Crux don’t sound appealing to me.
The back and the front are different parts of the system.
If it’s important to you, it’s important to you.
More important than chainstay length is where your “butt” is in relation to the rear contact patch. To further my observation point: You generally don’t hear anyone complaining about handling changes when they move their saddle 10mm further forward.