Ok, maybe I’m late to the party on this, but I was looking at another Forum post that gave some extended ‘definitions’ of the different TR workout ratings. That post was backed up by the TR website, which shows the following:
Looking at the descriptions of the workout ratings when completing a TR workout in Zwift, though, I see this:
- Nothing at all
- Very easy
- Easy
- Comfortable
- Slighly challenging
- Difficult
- Hard
- Very hard
- Extremely hard
- Max effort
And based on what I see in the TR app for my Zwift workouts, the Zwift rating appears to, effectively, be cut in half and round up to the next whole number to match with the related TR rating.
Intrinsically I have no issue with this. However, now that I’ve seen the TR rating descriptions, Im suddenly wondering if I’m giving the workouts I do I. Zwift too hard of a rating.
Example: yesterday I did Creise. I rated this as 8 (very hard) because it felt, well, very hard. In TR this was rated as 8/2=4 (very hard). However, had I been aware of the actual TR rating descriptions, I would have rated this workout as ‘Moderate’ (a 2), as I’m sure I could have completed (at least) one more set of intervals. Going back to the Zwift ratings, a 2/Moderate would equate to 3/Easy or 4/Comfortable in the Zwift ratings, and thus workout was neither of these.
So, IMO, being that the TR workout ratings have been around for much longer than the related Zwift ratings, my feeling is that the rating descriptions in Zwift should be updated to indicate something more on par with the related TR rating to which they will be equated.
Additionally, I’m now thinking I need to go back an re-rate yesterday’s workout, and possible some from previous weeks, also.
Thoughts?