Rolling hills. But if you’re doing a crit or XCO, we’re already considering it as punchy.
The hills are more for gravel, marathon MTB, and road races.
Because Masters Plans is more descriptive for most people. And based on feedback there’s not confusion around it.
Yes, in the future AT would be able to remove intensity from your week, and then prioritize your most intense workouts for that week (rather than skip them).
Im a little confused by your question, but you can change the number of days you can train in that week. You can kinda see it as drop downs on the right side. It’s going to be an advanced section.
Then in the future we’ll automatically do it based on the time you have available to train.
Im having problems understanding your post.
I think you’re asking for all the plan settings to be in one place, but still be able to access it from different places. So career would be another good place.
Along with the training plan section.
Yes, we’d need to do Apple and Garmin to capture most of the market.
Found out what it is. You’re trying to add “Time Off” which recalculates your plan, which is more than 2 years ago.
If you want to capture it on your calendar, just add it as a “Note”
Re. your repeating race query, I do a summertime crit series weekly between September and end-March. That’s a lot of repeating races!
@Nate_Pearson When you update your plan days/durations/intensity in the block, is there a delay in the changes being adapted in to the calendar. I wanted to move my easy day (Masters Plan) from a Wednesday to a Friday but after clicking on update it first refuses to budge and secondly has become a SS session (defaulted to pre masters plan I think). I also had a number of small changes I wanted to make to suit my current availability but I had no success there either. Ive emailed support about them but should I just be patient?
Clickable link to a web page with samples to make it easier to understand elevation profiles are what type? Since I’m sure there will be border cases maybe have some details about how the training for one is different then another. (And easier to update later not delaying the release of the feature)
If (when please) you do this, please do it better than TrainingPeaks does this today. For me today, TrainingPeaks gets metrics (e.g., weight, sleep, RHR, etc.) from two sources: Garmin Connect Health & Apple Health. What this means is that I end up two two separate metric annotations on every day of my TrainingPeaks calendar - one with the info pulled from Garmin Connect Health, and the 2nd
Maybe something as simple as setting which service if the primary one and if for a certain type of data there is more than one source giving the data choose the data from the primary.
I’m not getting duplicate data - the Garmin Connect Health for me is just weight from my Garmin scale; everything else (e.g…, sleep, steps, etc.) is from Apple Health - just two metric “annotations” on each day on my calendar.
I’m not a designer, I’m sure you have somebody on your team better suited to answer on the color scheme than me.
I understand it’s a detail, I’m just pushing the point since the rest of the design is very good but this color is very much off for me.
From a pure consistency perspective, there’s some crossed colors IMO.
- TR has always had blue blocks within their app and related workouts when viewed on the Calendar.
- The TSS graph has used green for as long as I can remember. This includes dark green for TR with lighter green for non-TR stuff. This alone seems like too close of an association where the two items are rather different in many cases.
- With the addition of Outside workouts shown on the calendar, these are shown with green blocks instead of the blue that was the original for Inside workouts.
So… it would seem the most obvious to:
- Show Inside workouts in the TSS in Blue to correspond with the main app and results.
- Show Outside workouts in the TSS in Green to correspond with the Calendar preview.
- Show Other workouts beyond those some different color like orange another unique option.
Below is a super fast Paint example, but I’d expect this concept to push to the “Planned” stuff as well with it being a lighter shade based upon the main color for each category as appropriate.
Essentially, use color as a more clear differentiator on a very high level. I know TR has aimed for a “less is more” approach traditionally, but I feel that also limits the easy of access to info that could be more quickly relayed.
IMHO less is more would result in 1) all workouts showing as blue (single color) on the calendar, regardless of inside or outside, and 2) single color on TSS graph. And while I’m here, provide an actual PMC chart. FWIW I’ve been doing very effective RLGL since 2020 (coach refined and provided proper guidance, versus my earlier efforts from 2016-2017).
oh weird, I was able to do this. I forwarded this to the team to investigate.
Oh good idea! I sent this to our designers for their opinion
Can you share what you’re doing with all of us?
Got to the bottom of this one.
We have a bug that stops you from adding annotations before Jan. 1, 2018.
Good news is this will be fixed with the rebuilt calendar! I just tested it out. 