It depends what your purpose is. A 7 point is often the best but 5 tends to be better than 10 especially if what you care about is precision.
The historical data is all 5 point. So changing it now for a potential minor improvement doesn’t appear valuable. It’s not a fundamentally flawed measurement, it’s probably statistically better than the Zwift survey from an inter-respondent perspective.
Trainerroad has one scale. A 5 point scale. If you use the zwift integration it maps their 10 point scale to a 5 point scale.
I agree, I am not advocating for the 10. even though TR is already using both a 5 and a 10 which adds to the confusion of how to rate. Clearly I am not rating the 5 the way they need the 5 to be rated.
TR only has a 5 point scale.
Not sure if @eddie or @Caro.Gomez-Villafane could have the survey knowledge base article on the survey updated to reference how the Zwift 10 point scale maps to the TR survey results. That could clear up that confusion.
Eddie posed this a while ago:
Careful. I said the same and got flamed for it.
Having thought about this thread for awhile, there are actually 3 levels above hard if you include “fail”
For me hard=crushed a tough workout! Yes! Very hard is “sure am glad THAT’S over”. All out is using most or all of my tricks to eke out success. Fail is a pause, dropping the power even just a little, skipping the last one, etc.
I certainly have “failed” sweet spot workouts and had some all out ones too. TR adjusts and on we go.
Joe
Interesting that you say that. The other day I had to “pause” a workout to help my wife put our babies to bed. I was gone for about 8 min. Came back and completed the workout and labeled it as “hard”. TR said I would receive a progression to my level since I paused for too long…and it actually timed my pause for me. Kind of cool actually if you’re pausing due to fatigue and intensity, not cool at all if you’re pausing because you need to put children to bed 
Hi Eddie, how should we think about rating for sweet spot intervals which are shorter?
For example recently completed Antelope +2 which is 1h30 of 5x10 at 94%. I also had Geiger 1h of 3x12 at 88-94 a few days ago. For both my HR was drifting and by the last interval would get to around LTHR. I am not surprised because I had a cold and then long haul travel to get over in the two weeks before Geiger.
For both of these I felt that I could have completed another of these longer intervals and possibly two more for Antelope+2. I doubt I could have completed the entire workout. I looked at the support page https://support.trainerroad.com/hc/en-us/articles/4404884465563-Post-Workout-Surveys and I can’t figure out the right response.
Definitely not Easy, somewhere between Moderate and Hard. Where I am unsure is because these are longer intervals so am I interpreting correctly that for long intervals the ‘set of intervals’ really means the final interval (aka Moderate is the right choice, I could do another set) or does it mean the ‘whole workout’ (which would mean Hard is the right choice because it’s one more Interval – but it also leaves no room for a Moderate ranking because re-doing the entire workout would be Easy).
I know this sounds like I’m overthinking it but it’s been bugging me for ages!
thanks
Easy
This ride felt easy and non-taxing, requiring little effort or focus. You could repeat the ride and pass it without issue.
Moderate
This ride was somewhat comfortable but required some focus to complete. You felt a little challenged but had confidence that you could finish. If the ride had an additional set of intervals, you could complete it.
Hard
This ride required effort and focus and was challenging to complete. This will feel tough and you’ll look forward to this ride ending. If there was an additional interval, you could have done it with some focus.
Very Hard
This ride was very difficult to complete. This ride tested you. If there would have been one more interval, you wouldn’t have been able to do it.
I’d just follow what it says in that doc.
Don’t think about whether you could have re-done the entire workout, but just the last interval.
I see what you’re saying here, where moderate says “an additional set of intervals” and hard says “an additional interval,” but just consider the last interval.
I think what’s described as a “set of intervals” refers to something like over/under workouts where the last set of intervals includes all of the overs and unders, rather than just the last interval (usually an over). Does that make sense?
The same could apply to other workouts that have sets.
I’ll let the team know that this has proven to be a bit confusing..
Wow - I feel better after seeing this. I’m experiencing the same thing, I failed a VO2 today (too intense). My last FTP detection was last week. Afterwards, it adjusted my new FTP target BELOW my current FTP. Looks like I bail on the TR Plan Builder Plan and go back to self coaching, just use TR as a workout library….
Yes! Thanks for your response. I was of the same opinion (O/Us or VO2 interval styles rather than the longer ones). Glad I’m not alone in thinking that way.
I’m not surprised, given the contrast between what you’ve been doing for the last few weeks and what you got planned between now and your AIFTP Prediction.
Halving your TSS will do that, I guess, all other things being equal.
Your assuming my plan the next few weeks is reduced TSS ???
Not so much “assuming” as having looked at your calendar and seen what’s in there. 
Sorry, your post makes no sense to me. Either I’m reading wrong (no native speaker but usually very familiar with English) or something is very off:
What you say is that if you have a 3x9min O/U workout and can do anther 9min O/U at the end you just rate this “moderate” and if you can only do one single little isolated Over portion at the end then rate it “hard”??
I would never ever rate this way. This would go against all RPE gods in my universe 
. A “set of intervals” should mean multiple 9min O/U blocks just as with constant intervals. The 9min is the interval no matter if it’s O/U or constant watts.
I’m trying to convey that when answering the post-workout surveys, it’s not always just the last singular interval that we’re referring to. A singular interval in and over/under workout would be just the over, and that’s not what we’re referring to.
In those cases, we’re talking about the last set of intervals, which in the case below would be both unders and both overs as highlighted.
Similarly, with mixed intervals, hard starts, etc., we’re referencing the last set of intervals, which includes all of the intervals in one set.
What you’re getting confused about, though, is when I say a set of intervals, you’re thinking that I mean the entire workout if you’re doing simple workouts like Eisenhower -1 below, but we’re only asking if you could do another interval or set of intervals, depending on the style of workout. Not the entire workout again.
Does that make more sense? Let me know if there is a better way to phrase this in your opinion, as I don’t want people thining that we’re only asking about one interval if they come in a set, but we’re also not asking about the entire workout..
For clarification, the chart already includes ratings for a SET vs. for a SINGLE. So in your example, nothing changes, right?
Doing the whole workout again would be Easy.
Doing one more set of over/unders would be Moderate.
Doing one individual Over would be Hard, and
doing no more Very Hard.
Is that still correct?
