Am I wasting my time on TR? Update: no

Its a fair take, and shows the diversity of people.

Simply the fact that someone labels it as “suffering” or “painful” doesn’t mean that I don’t enjoy the challenge of it.

During a race, for instance, I am all business. Am I having fun while gravel racing? I wouldn’t necessarily say its “fun”. not all the time. Some times it is, but its also a few hours running at almost max. My fun comes from watching my improvements, knowing I gave my all, etc. At races I see people that just go there to have fun and enjoy the atmosphere. Great for them, but that isn’t me! I have fun rides to do that. A race means 100%, to me. Even if 100% means last place.

We are all driven by different things. I am just saying that we all look at things in different ways and what motivates someone might not motivate someone else and vice versa.

Back to the OP’s original “am I wasting my time”, I concur with some of the other posts…

  • you might never hit 4w/kg. If you desperately want 4w/kg then you might have to look in the mirror and decide if you’re as lean as you really can be. Because weight loss will bump the w/kg faster than training all winter for perhaps 10 or 20watts
  • you shouldn’t have to be knocking down the percentage on sessions. I have a friend who constantly tells me his FTP is X, yet when I ask him if he can do even 10mins at that power he can’t. Clearly not even close to his true 1hour or sustained power! You should be able to do around an hour, regardless of the rabbit hole argument of what FTP is, if you’re doing say 2x20min or 5x10min then FTP needs to be set right. These efforts should feel like the effort is gradually escalating, not on the rivet from the start and clinging on till the end.
  • training consistently to the right numbers is how to improve. Sometimes training a little easier, coercing the body to improve rather than smashing it every session will nudge it along.
  • choosing another training regime or software system etc won’t get you to 4w/kg any quicker or more certainly if you don’t train in the right manner

If you really want that 4w/kg (or perhaps a goal more relating to continuous improvement) then engaging a coach would help, as there are lots of views on this forum and it’s not easy to know which advice to take, how to implement it and have confidence in what you are doing when you maybe don’t see immediate results. A coach will set you on a structured path with sessions that will work together and have a good awareness of how hard to train and what numbers to use regardless of what some ultimately flawed ego stroking software estimate might say. (And thats no criticism of any of TR or any of these systems, but it helps to have an awareness when the number it gives isn’t right). And no a coach won’t be cheap, but at what cost that 4w/kg :wink:

5 Likes

This :100: percent.

1 Like

I am similar 4 year and no watts change give 2 or 3 watts. At least I haven’t got worse and my endurance feels better, poor 52 year old physiology. Probably my last year on TR, time for a change.

1 Like

Looking at my FTP history since joining TR my FTP (AI FTP detected) is only 1.8% higher in just over 2 years, but I am happy to have maintained and besides my cycling has improved in other ways to one metric

Others have suggested that these workouts are potentially too challenging for you, or carrying fatigue or based on progressions from outside workouts that you didn’t quite nail in compliance. In addition, be aware that significant drops in intensity may change the energy system target which may undermine the purpose and therefore adaptation while still carrying fatigue onward. For me, backpedals were a recent revelation mentioned in a few AACC podcasts (I’m still catching up the backlog) that mean I can achieve more time in zone than i used to - previously once I started failing, ERG would bog down and I’d quickly fail. Now, I’ll consider a short bail-out and TR is very good at controlling the ERG to allow me back into the interval without “spiking” the power. Definitely a plus over other training systems.

My broader point, have a look at the following blog post on bailouts, that suggests a hierarchy to adapt when particular types of workout on a particular day are too hard.
[https://support.trainerroad.com/hc/en-us/articles/201954934-Workout-Bailouts]

I understood that AT takes into account interval compliance and would therefore mark-down a intensity reduction. I don’t know if that is also true of back-pedals - quite possibly as it always reduces the overall interval power due to the ramp-down and ramp-up around the backpedal.

@IvyAudrain, what can I say? A superstar.

I agree that the jump from LV to MV looks pretty daunting. I know that’s it’s been discussed lots in the forum and on the AACC podcast. And pretty much what @mwglow15 has said. Let me expand my sugested progression.

LV (3 efforts).
LV + TrainNow endurance.
LV + 2 additional TrainNow endurance.
LV + TrainNow endurance + unstructured/group ride >endurance.
OR perhaps MV (4 efforts + 1 endurance)
HV
MV + unstructured/group ride >endurance. This being similar to HV with one endurnace swapped out.
HV + Zwift race + unstructured/group ride >endurance + run(s) + swim(s) + new baby + new job + keto diet.

You know where you’re aiming.

Excellent constructive feedback from the forum. Well done @Murdoc for being so open to suggestions and responding to the criticism and suggestions openly and with good intent

1 Like

100% agree.

I’ve said elsewhere (Can’t remember if it’s here or a different post) that I believe there must be a confidence interval to the AiFTP detection. I am NOT an anaerobic athlete so am probably close to the 95-96% of their mark, and others might be bang on or even slightly above it.

I do think doing 2x20 off the gate if you haven’t done this before might not be a true method to see if it’s your FTP. Even mentally - but working up to it in a 2-3 weeks - if you can’t do it - than yes it’s not your FTP. But some people say 30 minutes - 70 minutes can be your threshold - not necessarily an hour.

Many, many people on TR plans would not be able to do 2x20 at the TR Training FTP. Most probably have TTE in the 35 min range, at best, at those numbers, and for many it’s probably not even that at the TR number. It’s why a few have taken to calling it “training FTP” or “training number” because the fact is, ramp test and AI FTPD numbers are overestimated (sometimes grossly) with respect to many people’s actual Functional Threshold Power. As always, YMMV.

3 Likes

I agree. My ego AiFTP is 313, but there is NO WAY I could do that for 20 minutes. I do it at 95% of my AiFTP which is about 297. so my ACTUAL FTP is probably 300-305 - because I can complete those workouts for extended threshold blocks (if I have enough calories). But damn that frickin ego…

2 Likes

Back in my TR days, I would ramp test at 280+, couldn’t hold it for long. The following season on my own, I would test FTP at 285 but hold it for 50min. It wasn’t fun having the same FTP for a year, but in reality, I didn’t. :rofl: And then I was actually able to go up from there… amazing what training long duration stuff at proper numbers will do.

4 Likes

It’s one of the issues ONLY chasing FTP gains as a measurement of progress. but the PLs don’t track time in zone as accurately as legitimately as doing longer and longer blocks in zone. The PLs are a proxy for this - and I get why they have so many varied workouts - they are more interesting with the small changes in power - or the sprints mixed in, etc… but people feel like they “stagnate” if they don’t see the FTP increase. And after the first months of starting structure or off the couch those huge FTP gains are gone from one block to the next.

1 Like

Good luck with your race. One observation on outside workouts: I find it very difficult to hit or maintain the required intensities even on z2 rides Sadly for me there’s no substitute for the trainer, especially on something like White +5.

Ha! I tested this out a couple of weeks back as I was concerned that my FTP might be inflated, not for any particular reason, just because I’d not been served up any Threshold intervals beyond 12 mins.

I binned whatever I was supposed to be doing and subbed in Gray + 5 (2 × 20 mins at 100%)

Got it done. :sunglasses:

3 Likes

Nice work! Certainly not meant to be a blanket statement for all users. :slight_smile:

1 Like

There were a few workouts that Chad T and others said were good checks if your FTP was set correctly. Anyone remember them?

Lamark 4x10 at threshold.

3 Likes

I’ve recommended Lola in the past. Essentially a short build into 30 min at threshold. Good proxy for the shortest version of Kolie Moore’s FTP protocols.

5 Likes

Before we get into what many athletes commonly experience when having a hard time maintaining power targets - I looked specifically at your history of doing recovery and endurance rides outside, and you generally do a pretty good job of staying in that zone!
There are things we can work on to make that power a tiny bit smoother when riding outside to stay a little more compliant to that zone (which we’ll get into!), but comprehensively, you’re meeting the goals of those endurance workouts outside pretty effectively.

For educational purposes, we’ll also discuss what other athletes may encounter when having a hard time with power targets outside while we’re on the topic of workout compliance.

First: it’s important to identify that it’s not expected, nor reasonable, for your outside power profile to look perfectly smooth, so lets cover a few different scenarios during which you may not meet power targets for outside rides, when it’s okay, and when it may be impacting your success in getting faster.

1. You’re trying to be near the target, and mostly there, but your power profile has lots of ‘spikes’.

When attempting to meet a power target, what we’re trying to avoid that can result in a lot of spikes are instances of ‘chasing the power’, where you look down and see you’re off target and try to compensate with a surge, overshoot, and feel like you’re constantly adjusting.
A common misconception for outside workout is that you should be monitoring your head unit every second of the interval in order to get that smooth power profile, which is not the case (and is also dangerous!). Instead, just glance down at the timer briefly every 5ish seconds for those shorter ones to make sure you’re meeting target power (and to check-in about how much interval time you have left), and using feel to really practice settling in once you know you’re at power.

Knowing what your threshold power, for example, feels like after confirming on the head unit and then consciously trying to hold that by feel takes practice, but also involves not surging/coasting to level it out once you realize you’re off target. Gradual, minor adjustments when aiming for a power target are key, and doing so smoothly is a SUPER valuable skill to practice!

Finally, making sure your head unit is set up in a way that enables clutter/distraction-free visibility when trying to hit power goals is key in achieving this. There are some screen setup best practices for you here: '‘Garmin Workout Sync Best Practices’

2. With the terrain I’m working with, it’s not possible to follow that zone exactly.

Thats okay; in some instances.
Based upon the workout typed, its tricky to know under which circumstances it’s critically important to stick to the format of the intervals with a high degree of compliance, and when its okay to be flexible and extend rest/time between intervals.
Some workouts require you to be strict in the timing of the efforts, others not so much, where the goal should always be to prioritize the work intervals assigned instead of overall time or TSS.

These guidelines should help you differentiate when there needs to be rigidity in the workout, or when you can make loose changes if needed, as it does scale differently based upon the work.

  • Endurance/Tempo: Accumulating time without interruption at a specific intensity is a key tenet of prescribed Endurance and Tempo work, so if the interruptions you are experiencing are frequent, either restart the interval when circumstances allow you to be consistent, or just loosely keep track of time lost from interruptions and add them on to the end of the interval.
  • Sweet Spot and Threshold: These systems rely upon accumulation to achieve the intended goals of the workout, so brief interruptions are okay, but if they grow in frequency throughout the workout, you may be missing the intended gains of the work.
  • VO2max: VO2max intervals generally aim to increase the time you spend at peak aerobic uptake, and this is accomplished in relatively short intervals. Since these intervals are so short, and since rest has such a big impact on resetting your time at peak aerobic uptake, you’ll want to stick to the assigned work/rest time pretty firmly.
    This also applies with slightly less severity to rest between intervals, so if you need to take more time between sets to get to a good spot, thats okay.
  • Anaerobic and Sprint: These intervals are very short and specific, so sticking to the structure is key.

3. Im too tired/too bored to keep it in the zone prescribed.

-Can you not maintain endurance power targets because you’re fatigued?
That’s okay! Don’t push it, cut the ride time short if needed, answer you post-workout survey honestly, and focus on big recovery.

-Can you not maintain endurance power targets because it’s hard to make a ‘smooth’ power output?
Endurance is a pretty broad zone between 55% - 75% of FTP, so your fluctuations in power are totally fine, as long as you’re staying within that region and keeping the overarching goal of the workout in mind.
Things like getting out of the saddle for a couple seconds after a stop sign (and getting out of endurance zone as a result) are okay, as long as they aren’t standing-start big gear sprints for fun (lol), which brings us to:

-Can you not maintain endurance power targets because its ‘boring’/there are too many sections on your ride that you cant help but go hard on?!
Not good :laughing:. As we covered previously, all of these workouts are assigned with so much intention; even the ‘easy’ ones. The best way to make sure you don’t nail your super tough workouts is to not follow the plan when chill or achievable workouts are assigned.

I know firsthand how stressful it is for some athletes to feel as though they’re not maximizing workout time by having to do ‘easy’ workouts, that they’re not as important as difficult workouts above your current Progression Level, or that you’re not using training time effectively to improve quickly enough.
In reality, a ‘no pain no gain’ approach when it comes to workouts is a great way to burn out and plateau in your fitness. It takes a lot of patience and control to lean into those endurance rides and stay in that zone, but they’re crucial in moving you forward in your overall fitness and progressions long-term. Save those form-sprints and PR climb attempts to integrate into another workout instead!

All this considered, I don’t think you should opt to: ‘I have to do endurance workouts inside’, and instead could look like: ‘how can I approach riding outside differently to make this work for me within my training plan."
Take a look at some of the principals in the ‘Tips For Safe Outside Workouts - TrainerRoad Blog’ as well, and see if it makes a difference for you during your next couple workouts. As always, feel free to DM me if you have specific questions from your calendar for any workout’s outside ride approach, if you need me to glance at your power profile for an outside workout as a ‘compliance check’, etc. We’re here to help!

22 Likes

Scheduled Lamark this morning for nostalgia’s sake. It’s 4x10 @ “FTP” with 2 minutes between intervals. The 10 is not where the difficulty lies, but rather the 2. Barely enough to blow my nose, wipe my head and take a drink. That said, not once did I feel like I was “suffering.” I can’t even really say I was uncomfortable. Yes at times my “negative assessment machine” brain would tell me to switch it off once or twice during the third and fourth sets, but overall it was just work, not pain. Heart rate steady and never above my assumed threshold. I do think it’s fine to use progression levels to get to Larmarck knowing that this is what I would consider the minimum needed to be confident at your FTP and probably even this isn’t quite good enough from a TTE perspective. I will be continuing to work on that at the expense of FTP bumps. Might have been even easier if I didn’t do it at 5am fasted.

9 Likes

Very nice work on Lamarck. Looks like you had even more in you than that. I find the TR workout level calculations to be accurate. In my experience, once you reach a threshold level of about 7, you are ready to bump your FTP a bit. Lamarck comes in at 4.9, and from what I’ve read on this forum, each level is worth about a 2.4% bump. I think completing something like Elijah is a good confirmation of your FTP. That would be roughly equivalent in difficulty to completing Lamarck after bumping the intensity by 5%. Based on your workout description, you may already be there or close to it.

2 Likes