The following are 2 features I would love to see after AI is out for all. What features would you like.
Ability to enter blocks of weeks into planbuilder that I cannot cycle (family vacations, work trips, etc). If planbuilder could consider those it would be great.
[Admin Note: This request is covered within Adaptive Training and should be available upon the full release.]
Ability to enter a ride/route that you want planbuilder to help you in. Enter gps, power, cadence, and Hr. Or maybe only GPS and bike and body weight and planbuilder could help you based on current Trainer road AI and ramp test data.
[Admin Note: This request is new and not apparently covered by an existing topic, so we are setting this as the one and only issue covered by this topic.]
Per my post below, and the fact that TR “APPROVED” it, please do not continue posting different ideas in this thread.
Considering that this topic had 2 original ideas shared, and one of them is implemented in Adaptive Training, I am converting this to cover the second suggestion only.
Please search and either add comments to existing topics, or create a new topic if your idea isn’t already covered in an existing one.
I’m thinking by having data I indicated data regarding exact power intervals and cadence requirements for your Event would be exactly known. Right know the categories are very useful (but not as specific). It seems the data for a specific event could even better shape a plan.
I think it’s in the works, but I’d love to be able to enter xc ski or rollerski workouts into their system. I’d imagine there are many TR users who also do cross training and would like to have AT take those into account. Sometimes I look at my weekly hours/TSS and ponder how I can be so tired, but then remember I skied(snow or roller) a few hours, or did an interval session.
For example, I could hammer some intervals on rollerskis this summer, and TR wouldn’t know it, and schedule another tough workout for me to complete.
FYI, from a maintenance and tracking standpoint, TrainerRoad prefers a separate topic for each Feature Request vs what this seems pointed at being a one-stop-shop suggestion topic.
There are numerous existing Feature Requests, and TR wants people to comment in those topics to keep related discussion grouped. Therefore, I suggest instead of piling a range of ideas here, start by checking to see if there is already an existing thread and add your thoughts there.
To aid in searching, here is a filtered search example.