I set mine up with a remote for both front and rear shocks. I bought a new damper for the fork and a used rear shock to make the conversion. I am using a Fox 2 stage trigger.
1 Like
Heavy, and I donāt think they provide a good shifting experience (from reading reviews), but I really, really like that theyāre playing with closer ratio
2 Likes
Oof, yeah the close range cassette is certainly a little heavy. FWIW I have the older Helix cassette on my bike currently and the shifting performance has been fine with SRAM GX (non-AXS). Itās admittedly not the quietest setup, but the shifting is reliable enough and doesnāt lag appreciably. I very well may be not discerning enough to complain, but Iām happy with it, and the cost-weight ratio was the best option when I was building my bike up.
1 Like
Yeah, it might be just some people nit-picking as well. Some people find SRAM fine, others Shimano only, Iāve got a Garbaruk winging itās way to me. If it were cost effective to get a regular HG freehub for my new hubs I think Iād have just about gone for the new 11-52T option.
As it is Iām hoping Iāll be happy with 10-52. Definitely cool to see other options though as Iāll eventually have to replace cassette (hoping for increased lifespan/durability with the mostly all steel construction).
1 Like
New Pivot Mach4 SL XC race bike:
4 Likes
Great news!
Notes:
Iām surprised at the geo, it looks like they only half committed to updating it.
No mention of LiveValve at all.
Still a very expensive option.
Not sure why youād choose this bike over the ibis. Other than aesthetic reasons (ibis being super unfortunate looking). Even the Anthem I think looks a better bike than this, just down on bottle cage mounts.
2 Likes
Its like one of those bikes they make to just have something in the segment.
1 Like
The Mach 4 seems like itās quite a bit more aggressive (both in geo and travel) assuming you get the XC build and not the WC build. I was thinking about an Epic Evo but am supposed to be able to get a team deal on Pivots and might be picking one of these up in lieu of the Epic Evo.
The WC M4SL and the Epic Evo are quite different on paper.
Iām a big Pivot fan, but am disappointed they didnāt push the envelope here.
The 120/115mm version looks pretty good, though the reach is short and the STA still a smidge slack and HTA a smidge steep.
120mm of XC tuned DW link would be awesome. I wonder if itās the same shock tune between the two models.
1 Like
I sort of agree at least on the reach. In one of the writeups it says they based the geo around the WC model (which they say will only be 3% of sales) and then added a 120 fork which seems backwards to me. If the reach were 475 mm in the large XC model Iād be slightly more stoked but on paper the geo is identical to other very popular ādowncountryā bikes on the market. I really dig the flip switch too. I mostly just ride mellow-ish flow trails (central oregon trail builders seem allergic to creating trails with rock gardens) but would prefer something snappier for the 4-5 races I do every year.
It should certainly be snappier.
Which bikes are you comparing that are identical?
In XL with the 120mm fork itās only 482mm. Iām sure thatās fine, but when Pivot first came out with the bike it was one of the early āslackā XC bikes. I expected them to at least build a bike that would be modern when it came out.
(Itās the exact same reach as the Blur TR, so maybe youāre right that itās in the ballpark - Iād just expected ~500mm and ~66Ā°HTA for the rowdy version)
Iām mostly comparing to the Epic Evo but also the current RC Spark (all in size large)
- HA - 66.7 Mach 4/ 66.5 Epic Evo
- Reach - 462 mm Mach 4 vs 460 Epic Evo
- Wheelbase - 1189 Mach 4 vs 1194 Epic Evo (mostly due to the longer CSs)
I only use the Epic Evo because I think itās one of the more aggressive āraceableā bikes on the market at the moment. The Blur TR is a bit more conservative (though the size large seems geared towards shorter riders). Iāve also been considering the new Orbea OIZ which has pretty similar geo (same wheelbase but 67 deg HA and 472 mm reach in size Large)
You are completely right, I take most of it back. Itās squarely in line with every model right now thatās in the middle of the geo range.
Iām back on the bandwagon.
I still think they should have gone to geo closer to the Spark RC than the Evo/Blur TR etc.
1 Like
That XL Spark is significantly larger than the others, very interesting. In size large itās much closer to the others but you also have the adjustable headsets with the Spark. I have a close friend whoās Scott sponsored and is quite adamant I buy a Spark but I definitely prefer a pretty supportive bike for general riding (mostly for āpopā/fun factor) and the reviews of the Spark all seem to indicate itās kind of wallowey in the descend mode but it might be better in the RC models.
To be fair I only ever look at XL geo columns.
I expect the next iteration of bikes to come in at the sort of 490-510mm reach for XL, which is why I thought the new Pivot would skip to that. Theyāre kind of out of step with development cycles now.
It definitely seems like an excellent option.
Iām coming from a 2021 Spark 910. I put a 120mm air spring in which brings the geo similar to the new RC (but way shorter and slacker STA). I think the Spark is an absolutely incredible bike and Iād love to try the RC. I think the shock tune on the 900 series might be softer, which is why I wonder about the tune of the M4SL between versions. Thatās just a guess as itās just a bit more plush than youād think, and Iām looking forward to trying a more supportive XC tuned frame in my new (to me) Large Vitus Rapide FS. It for sure wonāt be as capable a descender, but it gains in geo.
I have had an experience when I received a warning from my head unit (Wahoo) that my battery was low. I charged the derailleur battery thinking it was that but it was actually the shifter. I think I just get a good or low but not a percentage.
1 Like
Perfect 
. Hoping Garmin is the same 
.
Anybody here have lots of saddle time on a Fox Transfer SL?
I would very much like to know your experience.
Thanks!
1 Like
I have it and it is light and that brings a few things with it 
