I asked a question based upon my Intervals age/power data and TR guys answered it, but incorrectly assumed I was referring to Coggan data, when I was referring to the Intervals age-W/Kg charts. Here’s the video: Metabolic Efficiency, Marking Riders, Sustained Power and More – Ask a Cycling Coach 314 Since I’m an old guy and have been training for only 3 years, my Coggan data is not strong. But what’s interesting is my short power using Intervals age/power/WKg is in top 1/3 of my peers, but 20+ minutes is bottom third. But for Coggan, my 20+ W/Kg trend is other way, with longer times better my short power. I’m guessing that’s the nature of Coggan data, which is geared toward short races?
DavidWms
628
Related topics
| Topic | Replies | Views | Activity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trainerroad User Percentage Tables | 22 | 8232 | July 13, 2019 | |
| How does your Watt/kg stack up against other TR athletes? | 48 | 5252 | April 15, 2026 | |
| Update to the FTP bell curve for cyclists | 49 | 5771 | April 21, 2023 | |
| *POLL* What is your current W/Kg *POLL* | 23 | 4520 | October 6, 2019 | |
| Anyone over 50 at 4 watt/kg? Can I make it? (Long) | 195 | 28573 | May 9, 2024 |