Yeah, I’m no expert either, but I have seen him say his own training ends up being pyramidal.
2 Likes
I think that the question as posed assumed that it’s not possible. I.e. I can fit in 5:00-6:00 am every morning, but there isn’t a scenario where skipping one morning session means that I get to ride from 5:00-7:00 the next day. There are lots of people with a consistent schedule that gives them a few hours of free time per day, not a total number of time per week.
I remember Seiler giving that answer and finding it super frustrating because it was not at all applicable to the way my schedule works in real life, haha.
2 Likes
LOL, so the cynical view is that he recognizes PYR as valid, and maybe even better than POL for cycling, while still pushing POL to the masses? 
2 Likes
He is doing threshold workouts, zwift racing, sst with burts, z1 with burts etc. So basically yes, it is pyramidal. And yes, his polarized is pyramidal. That is why I completely do not understand blindly following to the letter some concept that no one in cycling is using, even the author himself nor his daugher he coaches 
For me the main insight is - do not too much intensity, make your intensity days hard and do a lot of z1 rides. The rest is basically muddy mumbo-jumbo.
10 Likes
Because it is good workout, as rearch states:
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/sms.13865?af=R
But in relation to easy days very easy, steady rides and walking up the climbs etc it is a little hypocritical:)
Do not get me wrong - i like his approach as I think that pyramidal approach is great. It is only a little bit funny when people want to be more holy than the pope.
1 Like
Why? I’d rather get advice from an actual coach, rather than a research physiologist that I’ve heard say cyclist train polarized when he knew they didn’t.
3 Likes
I’m just being practical, why bother paying attention when I can do an hour of threshold and have almost zero decoupling? Seiler said that is a measure of LT1, should I use my FTP as LT1? Look, Seiler has some interesting studies on ‘best’ interval formats where best is defined from an intervention point-of-view. Beyond that I’d rather listen to cycling coaches. Versus a researcher that looks at high-level coached athletes and makes statements like “cyclists train polarized” and then takes heat and changes his position because he knows that is not true. Inigo San Millan is both exercise physiologist and a coach to pro teams, he is far more interesting from my point-of-view.
1 Like
Simply trying to point out the comedy of trying to use anything beyond “hard days hard, easy days easy.” Polarized the way Seiler originally defined it, well that polarized makes sense to me when doing a block of really hard full-gas vo2max work. Beyond that I don’t get polarized as originally defined, at least for cycling. Now if I was a cross country skier it starts to make more sense…
And to be honest, he is an above average communicator IMHO. Its just that he did a land grab with polarized, and enjoying his 15 minutes of fame. Somewhere I posted an article that Seiler wrote back in the 90s. Most of the talking points he uses now, he was using 20+ years ago.
1 Like
my impression is that many either consciously or unconsciously believe that highly precise targeting of either HR or power results in superior workouts and adaptations.
4 Likes
That is true, regardless of the training mode in use. Seeing people complain about coming up short on an interval by 1w, or missing a second or two at the start of short/shorts are all signs similar to that obsession on data accuracy & precision.
I say that as a recovering over-analyzer, and now take things far more loose than when I thought I was doing things “perfectly”
7 Likes
The same current state. My first year was worrying about single watt difference. This year I was doing almost all the things more “by feel”. Fitness difference? I have to admit - no another 100W FTP increase 
Real difference? I think I understand myself a lot better, fintess increased and my mind is a lot happier:) Not to mention that when you better know how precise are pm or how your body is a little bit different every day you understand that being over-precise has no place in cycling. That is why we have zones not single power targets.
4 Likes
So true…luckily I talked a couple into the benefits of 3-5hr z2 rides and once they read some of the literature, tried it for a couple of months and saw big gains, they are totally sold. I now have a great little group for enjoying long steady z2 rides several times a week and then we all smash ourselves however we feel like solo on other days 
3 Likes
Yup, super common for the machismo and such to push group rides too hard.
Takes real discussion and education to get people on board. Some don’t and won’t care. But if you get some to get on board, it’s great.
3 Likes
I’m so envious of this. I can’t pass on literature. The fact that they see me doing structured workouts is enough to get called a “nerd”. I think the problem is that these guys have busy lives and don’t make time to ride as much as I do so when they get the chance it’s an all out hammer fest.
I just can’t make it happen with my riding buddies. For whatever reason rides always go into that happy-hard zone regardless. It’s not even a machismo thing (sometimes it is), it’s just there’s a “boredom with riding endurance pace” so they just naturally push into Sweet Spot. I also think it has a lot to do with having zero understanding of the benefits of endurance paced rides.
I can’t tell you how many rides along gorgeous scenic routes have been ruined due to just riding too hard to enjoy the views.
6 Likes
Their rides are fine, even great if that is what they want. As is sometimes the case, the issue here is people having different goals and objectives. Group rides are fun at times, but I find them frustrating as much or more often. Many reasons behind it, but that’s lead me to do more solo or very small groups of 4 or less, when we actually agree on what we want to do.
I’ve had moderate success on larger group rides, by simply stating my plan before we roll. I always say that anyone who likes my plan is welcome to join me. I stick to my plan (important as a “ride leader”), and I get a few takers that have similar goals or are just happy to adjust their plan and roll with me.
I don’t expect the entire group to change or follow me. They are free to smash each other and if I end up alone, that’s fine too. I know my goals and having anyone else along, even for part of the ride is gravy.
3 Likes
What would Seiler propose for a LV?
TR don’t Update the Training Plans, don’t know why. Perhaps too much time spend for YouTube-Videos and Blabla and too less for the Software and Training itself?
The group ride thing doesn’t float my boat.
If I wanted to do a group ride I use Zwift. Good fun, but I always end up completely blown apart. Which is why I’m now very disciplined and stick to my TR training sessions 
1 Like
- Thats absolutely false.
They revise plans (via changes to workouts in called in them) and have done so for years. I don’t have time to search for it now, but there is even a thread on here that points to the changes in the plans.
I also fully expect them to update the POL plans as the see how people use them over time.
2 Likes
Okay thanks for the heads up.
I understand. So the workouts are being updated.
Looking forward on the next POL update.
My first POL MV Training 6 weeks is finished this week 
I haven’t tried the POL training yet. I’m trying to finish up the Specialty Plan LV and finish in 3 weeks, and I will give it a try. Mentally for me is hard to keep riding tempo/threshold all the time on any SS plan. And also I kept feeling tired after the workout so I can’t do any free rides. All I do with the SS plan are focusing on recovery. I rarely ride any free ride during the week.