Yes, I believe this is the process but @Nate_Pearson should hopefully be able to confirm (if indeed the exact process/decision has yet been made?)
Iād go the other way - given that the constantly depreciating income from legacy users is what doesnāt really make sense long term, give us the option of accepting future price increases, but locked in at our current level of effective discount (i.e. if we currently pay 70% of headline rate, weāll always pay 70% of headline rate).
Also fine by me.
Has this been announced yet?
I just let my $99 legacy TR subscription go. I think it was for the best, it was just making me grumpy about TR - I wasnāt really using the software, I was just paying the money in a FOMOish hope that new features (non-TR workout analysis, adjustable hours per day, etc) would finally arrive and mean that Iād want to use it again. If TR does release some really compelling functionality I would be OK paying the regular price.
Iām Legacy at $99 and will keep it.
I think its worth $99 for the podcast.
I think it saves me way more than $99/year in tires, drivetrains, gas back and forth to the trail head, ER visits, etc.
That being said, it would probably be smart for your medical insurance to subsidize your subscription.
Every now and then I read something someone writes that is exactly what I would write if I only had the skill to express myself that well. rthompson nailed it for me.
See the official TR post on the latest update and implementation.