Yes, the only “new” thing here is the redesigned front section.
The rear end remains the same as it has been for years.
1 Like
I do think InsideRide should look into upgrading the rear to make it easier to setup the Kickr so it is perfectly vertically. When I had my E-Flex, getting the Kickr vertical took more effort than it should have.
1 Like
Agreed. It is initially set with the primary adjustment of the leaf spring by the orientation using the slotted end mounted or the opposite end. But you can also fine tune with the fore-aft location within the pipe clamps on the center foot.
Not many people realize this and I don’t think IR has covered it outside of their initial setup distance recommendation. Ideally, one location should work for everyone, but there are many reasons it needs some adjustment.
I considered making a threaded section for adjusting the final resting angle of the leaf spring vs just having it based upon the flat of the supporting cross-tube. But I got close enough with the f-a placement that I avoided the extra steps. I do think either better coverage of the placement is useful or adding a real-deal connection that makes fine tuning easier would be great.
1 Like
Thanks. I’m gonna give it a try.
1 Like
Also, do I need anything to connect my QR fork? No info about that on the InsideRise web site…
The front section defaults to the O.L.D. 100mm quick release standard, so that is good. I don’t remember for certain if the E-Flex includes the skewer though. I think it did not and I had to use an extra one I had.
1 Like
I just stumbled on an answer to the question of whether InsideRide plans to offer then new front section as a solo purchase. Turns out they do not plan to offer that at this time, unfortunately.
ETA: Not sure why, but InsideRide has apparently hidden/removed the video they shared when I posted this comment and link. I will update this post if/when they repost it or whatever the pending outcome will be.
InsideRide posted a video this morning.
I am hoping to start shooting my video after work this afternoon.
1 Like
I am happy to see InsideRide change their mind such that they do plan to offer the front section only in the future. My guess is that they are placing a priority on sales of complete Plus systems but good to see them open for the front-only option.
ETA: I tried sharing a FB screenshot, but apparently adding pics is busted right now. Here is the text pulled from there:
Also: We do plan to offer the front end of E-FLEX Plus as a standalone item, for current E-FLEX riders who wish to upgrade to the Plus version, without purchasing the whole unit. This option should be available towards the beginning of winter.
2 Likes
This is good news as back in May I purchased the E-Flex system. I don’t know if it was mentioned up thread or if even IR is considering making just a quick kit to upgrade the front base using the existing base, if possible, instead of buying the whole base, maybe saving money in production costs.
I am not expecting a smaller conversion kit vs a complete front section based on what I’ve heard from them, but I could be wrong.
Everything from the center cross tube on the base to the top is totally new and difficult between the units. The common parts are just the outer C-base tubes, internal slide rollers and fore-aft centering springs.
Anything is possible though and maybe they will offer that down the line.
2 Likes
Using the correct training app too!
1 Like
Ha, indeed.
Kinda related, I shot some videos showing the original and Plus units in use on a 3 minute section of that other software. 
I need to shoot some intro clips and add some narration. Hoped to have it done already, but Iikely to be later this week.
1 Like
@mcneese.chad would you say upgrading from the normal E-Flex front end to the Plus is worth it once they release it?
I haven’t made many tweaks to mine over the years with the exception of removing the elastics from the front for more fore/aft movement. I’m still quite thoroughly enjoying having the E-Flex, but have found the movement to be quite minimal these days as my pedal stroke and body position has gotten used to the E-Flex and I’m looking for some further improvements.
That is a tough question, and part of what I am trying to address in my pending video. Based on your comments, I do think you might find the Plus to be an improvement in lean control. My video shows side-by-side action with both setups, and there is what I see as more “activity” in the Plus vs the original.
I admit that I was never a big fan of the original design and how the bars moved in relation to the leaning action. Much is likely due to my long history of use with pure leverage (more up/down movement at the bars for leaning) vs the more steering input on the original (flat turning of the bars left/right). This is clearly visible in my video, especially when standing.
Not meaning to tease this video as I wish I already had it posted. But I have struggled getting back to my editing software after too many years away 
I need to shot a short intro and then I will be into the on screen text and final edits. We came up with a basic “Pro’s” list for each unit and I hope the video demo will add to that info. Worst case, we have bad weather set for Sunday and I will finish it then, if not before.
In short, I think many people will be fine with the original if seated comfort is the primary goal. But I find that the standing experience is vastly different and more preferred for me in the new Plus model. This is seconded by my close friend who has been testing these units with me the last several months.
1 Like
For any FB users, InsideRide posted a different video there just a bit ago. I will add a link to any YouTube video if/when they add it, for non-FB users.
1 Like
Touching back on a prior topic, connecting the front and rear sections of the E-Flex. I and others were wanting a way to prevent shifting and twisting of the front section in particular. I had one hack that I used for a while, but it was not easy to produce and not worth sharing.
This weekend, I hit on a super simple and effective solution, so I am sharing here for anyone interested… Below is option 1, that I think is the best overall solution. Basic design & dimensions:
-
The 15" dimension is from memory, and it might need a tweak. I will update once I double check. But just try to place them as wide as you can to engage the side of the rear section.
-
It is a single long 2" x 2" piece of lumber with two 2" x 2" spacers screwed and/or glued into place. I measured 2-3/8" [60mm], but it’s possible this could vary for other users. I’d suggest checking with a level and tape if you have the means.
-
Hold the bridge in place with four instances of any strap of your choice (two at each section). Cable ties, hook & loop or nylon straps and the like at the ends of each aluminum tube on the front and rear sections.
Rough and unpainted example of the work in progress from my friend, Barrett. The clamp is there just to hold the spacer for the glue to dry. The final setup will be the wood bridge with 4 straps.
And now is my overly simple straight and single example. one 2" x 2" about 36" long, with two velcro straps. This works well too, but lacks the longer engagement of the better design above. But it’s so simple and an improvement over nothing, that it may be fine for many users.
Key with either design is placing the straps just beyond the slots of the fore-aft motion so you don’t inhibit that at the ends of travel. Overall, this is simple and allows for infinite options on wheelbase with no moving parts.
3 Likes
So there’s no way to buy this thing if you are from Europe/Germany, right?
Not direct from InsideRide AFAIK.
I have heard of people in Europe snagging one, but I can only guess that they took extra steps to get it shipped there.
I really wish IR would figure this out because i think it’s a good market for them.
@mcneese.chad does this step make any sense to you? Mine isn’t aligned but I can’t see how I would change the position of those saddles.
