It seems to be taking a long time to work out the kinks, no?

[image] bobmcstuff: But it’s true isn’t it? Maybe, but you dismissed my argument with “TR have the data” [image] bobmcstuff: We can’t know how effective AT is unless TR publishes some evidence, Exactly (presuming they have actually looked at it), but , again, my post was entirely abou…

[image] WombleHunter: Exactly (presuming they have actually looked at it), but , again, my post was entirely about is this a beta test, not if AT works, you dismissed that with TR have the data, in my experiance, thats no a guarrente of accuracy, and like I said, a dismissive comment that can’t …

[image] bobmcstuff: I certainly can’t claim to know that AT is better than any other system, all I can say with any certainty is that it worked well for me this year. Never commented on AT working / no working

OK - I certainly can’t say whether the AT beta has been successful and nor can anyone else outside of TR. Is that better?

No, wasn’t commenting on AT Success or Success of the beta at all, in any way

[image] bobmcstuff: all I can say with any certainty is that it worked well for me this year Actually you can’t. All you can say is that you “improved”. You don’t know if this improvement was due to: TR making the plans easier. And even without AT, you would have improved because the easier…

You are right, it is entirely my perception. The smoother progression in Build is probably the main factor which kept me compliant, as I have got quite a bit of experience with TR plans over the years. Theres lots of things to like about it for me - I like the PLs and easy selection of sensible alt…

I seem to remember that when AT was in closed beta that TR were looking at bring individuals on board who fitted certain usage profiles. My assumption is that this was to do some A/B testing. Of course we’re all individuals so another assumption is that they were trying to have lots of smaller group…

That’s why I was careful to say “nor to the best of my opinion”. If TR did do careful A/B testing, then this would be great. And hopefully they will talk about this, even obliquely in the Q&A next week. I would especially like them to talk about what they are optimizing for: Compliance - hypothesi…

Adaptive Training -- How long does a beta usually last?

TrainerRoad Software

mcneese.chad November 1, 2021, 2:21pm 49

Well, considering the pending AT Q&A and the just released video, it seems very likely the beta period may well end this week. But that is just me reading the tea leaves so I could be totally wrong.

Topic		Replies	Views
Am I the only one not bothered about Adaptive Training? TrainerRoad Software	90	6634	August 30, 2021
Adaptive Training Closed Beta Update Announcements	1943	109497	August 19, 2021
:tada: :tada: :tada: Introducing Adaptive Training! :tada: :tada: :tada: TrainerRoad Software	4340	175476	August 19, 2021
Adaptive Training - Unuseable TrainerRoad Software	28	4654	August 30, 2021
Under the hood of Adaptive Training: Analysis in four graphs TrainerRoad Software	57	6856	February 8, 2022

Adaptive Training -- How long does a beta usually last?

Ask a Cycling Coach Podcast

We Are Here to Help!

Adaptive Training -- How long does a beta usually last?

Related topics

Get Faster with Adaptive Training

Ask a Cycling Coach Podcast

We Are Here to Help!