Because they thought they could get these “newcomers” to fall in line with their “unwritten rules”. Usually those guys are the strongest riders in any given field, so it works. If World Tour pros show up, then that is no longer the case, and they probably care less about being in “the club”.
This all works until it doesn’t. So you write an op-ed trying to guilt people into doing the same aka “gatekeeping”.
But there’s zero difference here to someone (let’s just say LtD), who carried supplies for the entire race under suggestion, continuing on through an aid station. He could have just kept tempo, or even slightly less, and that could have been the difference for someone.
LtD would have felt no pressure to continue as he knew he was the strongest rider and could dictate how the race played out, but what about a rider who can’t drop the group but has the endurance…
This makes zero sense. As mentioned he’s an ambassador to the DIY gravel racing scene and has every right to write an op-ed. Just as you have a right to disagree with it.
Jeff “No Aerobars” Kabush has been outspoken for years. In a far more brazen and brash way. This isn’t new, and really, Colin’s article seemed pretty chill.
If there was no cease fire agreed upon then I 100% agree that Roberge had every right to attack while other’s stopped. It’s not a complete advantage pressing on solo–if you have King, LTD, DJ, Stetina, and Strickland working together pressing on solo as Roberge did would be suicidal. Which it was.
Equally, did he up his pace? If I can avoid it I won’t stop pedaling during a race, always sucks to get going again. Even if I didn’t plan to use it as a tactical advantage I’d still carry on rolling and use the time until I was caught to recover a bit.
He was likely to be dropped by those guys regardless.
Regardless of written or unwritten rules, gatekeeping or whatever… the lead pack basically said they would be a team in the feed zone, one dude decided to try to ride away from a full team and so of course the team behind him chased him successfully. Just seems like a poor choice to me, haha. Not that many folks are making good decisions that deep into an effort like that though, huh?
The funny thing about all this sturm und drang is that—unless I misunderstood the couple of Gravel Locos race recaps, Roberge’s feed zone attack was widely considered bad tactics whatever your take on the sportsmanship.
For all this talk about “everyone agreed” it sure doesn’t sound that way: