Sweet Spot Progression

Really good effort! Heartrate remained flat during the interval!

+10 on mental toughness :wink:

1 Like

Is there a TR ā€œteamā€ similiar to the sweet spot team where there are some workouts already built out for intensive aerobic workouts? Wondering if I can save myself some time this afternoon.

@RONDAL I didn’t mean to sound pretentious here with this question, so I’m sorry if it came off that way. I often negative-split my endurance rides, but I’m pretty anti-erg mode in general for endurance/Z2 rides, so the idea of restricting your effort to a set percentage seemed odd to me.

I do all my endurance rides in free-ride because some days I’ll feel good starting at 55% and ending at 75%, other days starting at 65% and ending at 65%, and just about every other variation there is. If I were to always start out my endurance rides at a set % and stick with it in ERG mode then increasing the power throughout, I’d probably end up feeling either that I didn’t do enough, or did too much/went too hard. I’ve followed the same approach as Kolie Moore of riding endurance/z2 to RPE – ā€œfeel like you’re working, but could do it all dayā€ for several years now (long before I even knew who he was), and starting off easier and ending harder (negative split/ or progressive z2 as you call it). I would say my aerobic fitness has done very well because of it, much better than when I used to sit at a set wattage for hours on end. Some days I would go harder and other days much easier. Side note - through testing I’ve found I’m often riding at LT1 when riding to RPE, but with set wattages I’m either above or below. Getting used to that ā€œendurance feelingā€ is also really important to me

Anyways, just thought I’d say where I was coming from and note that me saying ā€œWhy?ā€, looks pretty pretentious and annoying of me to say. Sorry about that, and thank you for sharing your workouts in the thread!

1 Like

None taken. I will say the group in this thread has been super helpful in learning more about SST progression and helping each other out along the way.
Cheers

Took my progression up to 1x103@90% over 8 weeks, Just did a ramp test before starting my next block and debating changing one of the SS workouts each week for a threshold progression.

FTP went from 271w to 275, not a big jump and would probably get a larger number from the 20 minute test.

The progression of time at 90% isn’t likely to give you a big boost in FTP if you’re already fit. It will help with your TTE at FTP, however.

1 Like

Exactly, my debate is extending to 120 minute interval(maybe another 4 week block) or just going back and starting with 4x15 but run it at 99% and work the back up.

I would definitely go with FTP work - push it up and then extend.

1 Like

Do you have a reason to need to extend TTE beyond where it is or be able to sustain 90% for that long? If not, raise power, incorporate over unders and other hard rides and raise FTP.

My A Event in April is a 340mi single stage gravel race. The fatigue resistance that doing this SS progression has given me seems valuable for that event. Also keeping a large 5-7hour Z2 ride on the weekend, so can probably step away from the SS stuff for a bit to drive power up.

1 Like

Oof. Think I just found my current limit: 1x100min @ 90%*. Goal is 1x120 @ 90%; 12 workouts total. Happy halfway!!

*this was definitely a breakout workout!

3 Likes

what’s your thoughts on best way to drive FTP up? just under threshold? just over? or O/U’s? lactate tolerance or clearing isn’t of much use for my type of events, It’s all the long game, would riding at 99-102 be a good stimulus to drive the FTP up? We need a thread like this about threshold work!

2 Likes

Sorry for replying not asked, but my personal experience (60W increase) was 97% intervals and progression to 80 min TiZ. I was doing threshold 3x a week but that had an impact (or rather lack of) on my dynamic power burtst and muscle fatigue over ftp (my 5 min power and vo2 max was also improving but the problem was muscle fatigue).

ā€œMyā€ solution (and it worked wonders) was incorporating once a week SST with 30s power burts. You can also do threshold with 5s-15s burtsts. Working couple % under FTP has a huge (positive) impact on recovery. I have created some short experience in this topic:

2 Likes

Two things I like right now, and @jarsson covered them:

  1. Ride just below threshold, 97, 98% progressively in a few intervals out to TTE or just beyond.

  2. Over/Unders as he described: high sweet spot with 30-45s bursts progressing TiZ. You can see a couple versions of O/Us up about 30 posts. These are hard, but build lactate tolerance quickly.

Long rides help too.

I’ve been able to get a lot of threshold work in with these and recover from it without excess fatigue. Will it drive FTP up? Feels like it, but I won’t know for sure for a couple of weeks.

3 Likes

I second this tactic. Did it last summer (every 5mins). It works.

Have started doing similar, in the second half of my SS block, during the long 1x workouts: 10-15s @ 100% every minute for the last 10min or so. Nothing hardcore or set in stone, just working the fatigue resistance and getting acclimatised to future O/U & threshold sessions.

1 Like

My current O/U for this week is trying 3:00 at 92% followed by :45 at 112%, repeat five times, three sets (about 18min per set). We’ll see if that one goes better than last week.

1 Like

I find this interesting. I did an over-under progression this summer ending with Carpathian Peak +3. All were standard TR workouts (x @ 95%, x @ 105%).

What is your reasoning for doing a progression with larger changes in power/shorter over segments? Is this to target a higher avg heart rate?

For one thing, I think they’re easier to recover from than spending almost 15 minutes at 105% of FTP as in Carp Peak +3 and another 15 minutes at or over FTP. For another, it’s a better simulation of how you’d actually ride a fast paceline (I do these in standard mode), so there’s direct applicability to my outdoor riding.

Over the years, I’ve found TRs more advanced O/U workouts incur a lot - a LOT - of fatigue. I think you can get a similar lactate tolerance benefit from a shorter but more intense over and a still-challenging but lower under. This should allow for a longer interval, whereas TR really only has one set of O/Us that I would consider being long intervals and that appears in the build programs. That’s been my working theory, but I admit I haven’t dialed in a good progression.

I’m experimenting with a 1:4 over:under ratio. I did :30/2:00 for 20 minute intervals and had a great workout. I then progressed it way too much (more intervals and a :45/2:30) for the second one, so my third one is a shorter overall interval (only by a couple of minutes), with a 1:4 O/U ratio again but longer overall TiZ. By TSS and IF, it’s only slightly less intense than Carp Peak +3, but if it tracks post-workout fatigue like the others I’ve done, I’ll recover from it faster.

1 Like

Hi @kurt.braeckel and others.

Saturday i did 75min on 94%. Iam training for crit racing and I’m thinking about to move to SST over/unders. The reason i have is that the crit races are max 90-120min so i dont need to progress a lot more in time and i do allready 94% with not so much fatique, the day after i did again a good 3 hours endurance ride. At this moment my TTE is 55 minutes.

I think about to do tomorrow (today rest) 3x20min with 2min 90% and 30s 110% FTP. And in the weekend i will do outdoor longer SST blocks like last saturday.

What do you think about this?

I’m about to embark on a block to attempt this.

Tues 2:00/:30 O/Us
Thur TR Suprathreshold
Sat TR longer O/Us

Hopefully can budge FTP, and then will focus on the slightly easier (for me) TTE work again. Will report back.