Thanks, I’m better than I thought (and it often feels!) then!
1 Like
same, i feel very average. But it isnt as bad as i think.
Also gotta keep in mind, this is compared to other TR users. compared to the avg human being we’re all very good.
11 Likes
I like this new feature.
Comparison may well be the thief of joy but it’s also fun, sometimes interesting and can be motivating too 
2 Likes
This is a great mindset to have.
6 Likes
I’m also curious about this. The page says it’s “compared to other athletes like yourself,” which makes me think it’s filtered and not compared to all TR athletes. It would be nice to at least know what subset I’m being compared to and even better to be able to adjust things like age range yourself to see how that changes your rankings. Without knowing what subset of cyclists this is looking at, I don’t see a ton of value.
3 Likes
Can we PLEASE have it for long durations like 2, 4 and 8 hrs 
11 Likes
Yeah, but that’s not really anything new. TR had always done a ‘lean’ version of their data vs many other options. Part of their ethos since inception per my read and this follows that via being a ‘light’ version.
Deeper dives for this type and most other data will seemingly be sought elsewhere. Lots of users have asked for that stuff from TR but they keep on the ‘less is more’ train and I don’t see that changing anytime soon.
2 Likes
Hey, I’ve just renewed my TR subscription and it’s done a power profile, but the readings for all time are way off, so how can these be corrected, for instance, my 5 seconds is something like 1050w, and TR is saying 805, 60 minutes shows 173w and I did a ride last week and for a full hour I was at 242w, hour and half at 232w, and this is across the board?
I want the TR experience to be correct and not saying I’ve improved on lower figures than what I’m already on.
Thanks.
Are those relevant ride actually showing in your ride history on TR? Can be checkec in your Career page on the web.
Yes, I’ve just found a ride I did in December at around 1000w for 5 seconds again and that’s in the list of rides imported?
Keeping it in the “family”?
3 Likes
With this new functionality, does anyone know how to clip power spikes from a TR workout? Or is this a support request?
Have I ever said I phu@!&^%$##@ hate using phones for stuff like this?
The idiotic process they use for prediction and word replacement is worthless.
4 Likes
Same as always, must be done externally via stuff like FIT tools and re-imported.
TR does not offer any editing like that, unfortunately.
I think there’s some other filtering going on because when I change to w/kg in Intervals my percentages are still higher. Or I guess the populations are just different. It would be nice to have the extra granularity of what Intervals does in TR.
Love it
You can set the workout to be ignored for records iirc
I’m never quite sure whether my power pedals are wrong or right, when I have a massive spike for the one second when I’m standing on it to start moving. My preference would be that the 1 sec records be removed, surely they’re irrelevant anyway?
I like the idea of this, but it doesn’t seem accurate for me.
For example:
Is 424W for 1 minute really 95th percentile? I don’t imagine 220W for an hour puts me in the top 10% either.
Context: I’m a 56 year old bloke who has done no structured training in 4 years, and just basically has a very ad hoc and sporadic approach to riding.
Maybe I’m doing myself a disservice and I’m further along the bell curve than I think. Maybe I could accept it if the sample set is other 55-60 year old blokes. Maybe the range stretches from 20 - 80 year olds and those much older people bring the averages down.
I don’t know, but it doesn’t feel realistic to me. I’d like to see more context.
1 Like
We’re five weeks into this year, select last year or all time and to feel worse select wkg 
3 Likes
