Thanks for the references. I agree that studying motion would be interesting. That is the “science” (scare quotes because case studies are probably the best we can hope for) I was referring to. Hence the potential for commercial interest – from those selling movement devices.
FWIW I have engineered myself enough movement to spare my undercarriage, but it’s not the kind of movement that simulates outdoor riding, at least aesthetically. The fact that these two movement related goals both exist seems to interfere with the ability to discuss one of the goals in isolation (eliminating physiological discrepancies between training modalities).
2 Likes