I think I’m the only one that genuinely doesn’t think it’s been discussed to death. My reasoning for saying this is that when we ostensibly discuss “zone 2”, the discussion is actually about training overall. So folks on a TRAINING forum get tired of talking about TRAINING. I think what actually happens is that folks get impatient because their isn’t some nice, neat little thing we can all agree upon.
They also don’t want to read little semi-lecture-y paragraphs like I just typed . So here’s maybe some more helpful input:
I went almost an entire year in 2017 with sore legs or just overall (but mild) fatigue every single day. I didn’t know to look at it then but I doubt I could have reached my Zone 2 without my legs feeling it either. What was I doing wrong? Trying to “stick to the plan” and simply doing too much. Then after that, a group ride…oh, wait, intervals on Tuesday! You get the idea.
Probably not. You are likely just doing too much overall.
Won’t help you with this part of the equation. I enjoyed using mine for two seasons and learned a lot, but only a little of that was related to basic endurance riding.
I felt that way too. I openly mocked rides like Pettit (that’s just a basic endurance ride that used to show up on Wednesdays, in case someone wasn’t around five years ago). When sandwiched in between quality days it seems like an afterthought. They are important but not immediately obvious, in the same way that literally riding the duration of an event is not necessary to compete in an event (e.g. I’m a miler, so I just run really fast one mile runs over and over…obviously it doesn’t work that way).
Flawed thinking, but you already have some good input on that.
Then they ARE hard. But not because you don’t “know Zone 2”.
Zone 2 is also not recovery riding. It is volume building that is so fundamental to endurance sports that many coaches have to do this first, before introducing any intensity, even on ~10hrs / week. I’m not suggesting you do this, but just keep it in mind so that you don’t think things like “why is this endurance work even important”.
…when fresh. Same with any part of your power-duration curve. It’s WHEN FRESH. If you’ve fed the curve, when do you think those values have been established? Usually (always?) when you’re fresh and at your best. They aren’t constants, they are used to provide guidance and track change.
If I had to pick out one thing going on, it’s this.
2:36:12 indoor ride is GREAT…so don’t take this the wrong way…that is a lot. You are likely not recovering if it is that much Zone 2. We don’t just get overload from intensity. It also comes from duration. I’m not saying you’re thinking/believing this, but if you do enough Zone 2, you have to recover from that too. It CAN BE part of the recovery equation, but just riding a day of fairly long Zone 2 will likely not bring back the freshness.
Lose this. On your hours, no such thing as active recovery (at least, on the bike). Go for a walk. (I re-read and it occurs to me that this might be what you meant…IOW, not on bike. If so, )