Nice tip. This is what I do, too. It makes an enormous difference. You rest slightly less, but the odds of not being able to finish due to sharp resistance change go down drastically. You guys should add this tip to the texts in 30-30 workouts.
I will tag @ZackeryWeimer for this since he is actually a TR rep that can likely forward this idea to the best party in TR (since I am just an external user with forum moderator access).
For sure @GoLongThenGoHome , it all depends on how hard you push your body. Your comment on 30x30s being a good intro to VO2max workouts is a good one.
Now I wonder the difference between 30x30s or 40x20s metabolically. Maybe there’s a study out there already. Wonder which has more w/kg for your buck. I guess either one works fine if you execute them properly.
The more well-trained you are, the less effective 30/30s will be, because the recovery is pretty much entirely aerobic. Get too good at recovering and your body will be spending too much time below VO2 Max.
40/20s or 30/15s give a better balance of effort to recovery to keep you in the right state of hideous discomfort for longer.
The silver lining for 30/30s is you can go a bit harder on the efforts, and so they can be good if you’re using them more race-specifically for Anaerobic Capacity.
It’s likely 40/20 will have higher RPE and more lactate associated with the workload - longer work period and shorter rest period than 30/30. Here’s a chart from some guy named Astrand from before I was born. This chart shows the same amount of work being done at similar work/rest ratios but different durations and the lactate response.
They may be acronyms based on the English language, but I didn’t invent any of them (well, except for PPP). I have just been participating online since the Usenet days.