We just got notice yesterday of mandatory upgrades with TMBRA and they follow the same time guidelines, matter of fact a USAC representative is going over last years results and sending out upgrade emails to those who will be bumped up.
They’re urging people to upgrade themselves voluntarily before this weekend, but they also said the USAC official is combing through the data to see who’s going to be the lucky recipient of a mandatory upgrade notice.
Thank you. Interesting he says 5 top 5’s in a year. Doesn’t seem consistent with what USAC says based on the image above and the rule book which says 12 months for road but does not for MTB.
I must be misunderstanding something here - why the concern about being upgraded to the appropriate category?
If you qualify for the upgrade what possible reason is there to stay in the lower category with riders you’re demonstrably faster than? Is this fair to those riders?
Im almost certain before USAC started using the picture graphics for 2020 and quoted directly from the rule book last year and that it did state the it was 5 top fives in a calendar year with a field of 15 or more.
It would only make sense that they all follow the same time guidelines.
Naw , your not misunderstanding anything. I dont think anyone is saying they dont want to upgrade, but there are people that race and should be forced up …
I raced last year, did well 5 out of 6 podiums and upgraded myself to cat 2 and placed 9th in their last championship race of the year. Im looking forward to racing people of equal talent and condition, last thing I want to do is race against sandbaggers that dont want to upgrade.
There are plenty of riders that sandbag. It’s a character thing I suppose. There is a guy in DLoves category that has 10 top 5 finishes. Just race 4 times a year and you can stay in whatever category you want for as long as you want…if that’s your thing.
Sandbagging , hiding the strength, skill or difficulty of something or someone early in an engagement, may refer to:
Sandbagging in billiards and other games, deliberately playing below one’s actual ability in order to fool opponents into accepting higher stakes bets, or to lower one’s competitive rating in order to play in a future event with a higher handicap and consequently have a better chance to win
Sandbagging (grappling), competing in a skill-bracket or being ranked lower than one is deemed capable of
Sandbagging (racing), deliberately qualifying slower than what the car can actually perform
Sandbagging (law), suing for a breach of a contractual representation or warranty despite having known at the time of the contract that it was untrue.
Sandbagging (professional wrestling), where a wrestler being lifted intentionally shifts his weight to feel heavier, making the other wrestler appear weak or clumsy.
Qualifying for and being competitive are two different things. I might qualify for 2 because I’m competitive in 3’s although I may never be competitive in 2’s due to multiple considerations like natural talent, training hours, home life, etc…
I can’t speak for CX, but I think there is still a bit of a status/ego thing that goes with higher road categories. It’s not for safety/experience concerns from my perspective, but I’m sure that’s what they would say.
I wish it were self-selected for all disciplines. I agree with the forced upgrade stuff, but is there really any harm letting someone self-select for road like they do for MTB? If you are worried about someone with zero experience jumping into a p12 race and causing problems, just make the upgrade only based on minimum number of finishes at each level rather than worrying about the points/results. USAC should spend more energy policing the forced upgrades, the voluntary upgrades shouldn’t need to be managed.
I skipped Cat 3, raced 3 races in Cat 2 and podiumed 2 of them and upgraded to 1 right after that.
If you are too slow to be in Cat 1, it’s rarely a big deal. You’ll just get passed quickly on the first lap and you aren’t a danger to anyone at that point.
Most MTB races end up having multiple categories on course anyway, so I think we are all used to having to deal with lap traffic.
USTA leagues were the worst. The ‘good’ captains would manage their roster to keep people from promoting and scout out people that hadn’t been rated but could over perform. Getting bagled without winning a rally is sooo fun.
Yep, people managing their NTRP, hiding their sand-bagging single players by having them tank games and sets on the #3 doubles court then come out and crush at #1 singles the following week.
Guys who had no business playing 4.0 tennis but they didn’t want to lose at 4.5… former college players self-rating and tanking enough games to make it look competitive. SMH…
USTA tennis captains are a special breed for sure…