I’m in the same boat so will consider buying one. I have a 1040 so would have access to the extra info, but I’m not sure that I’d want it displayed.
I am inclined to agree with GPLama’s initial assessment though - I’m not overly keen on having half of the width of my display covered by detailed radar information. In heavy traffic situations, that would just wipe out half of my fields or obscure half of a map display at a junction, which would be pretty annoying. I can see that the information about vehicle size, location and closing speed could be used to form a more accurate summary threat level that could be displayed simply (pretty much as the old units do with amber / red) and have different levels of alert tone. But I suspect that taking half of the display to show information that I cannot process would get annoying, and that I would switch to a simpler display mode pretty quickly (assuming this is possible, which seems likely from GPLama’s video).
Will decide once full reviews come out, but might wait a bit longer in the hope that an updated camera/radar model will come out that includes an actually-decent camera unit.
Edit: and now I’ve actually looked properly at DC Rainmaker’s shots above
(only scrolled past on my phone before). That display doesn’t look too bad at all - in the Garmin product shots that I saw it seemed like it was genuinely half the display, but perhaps that’s configurable. So that’s good, at least. Seems a bit daft to have the threat level indicated by colours on the little warning triangles rather than colouring the whole vehicle icon. Ah well - it took Garmin about 3000 years to make the little arrow icon on map displays larger than about 3 pixels, so I won’t expect that to change any time soon!




