Best Racing Gravel Bike 2024

Holy hell dude…it is clearly the camera angle. The tops of my bars are flat.

I’m honestly now baffled by your obsession with my fit…

But you are right…I’m not 5’9". When they measured me before my kidney stone procedure a month ago, I was down to 5’8" and 3/4. I just can’t get myself to admit that I am shrinking at my age.

If you think that bike has “high stack”, you clearly don’t understand bike fitting…which I guess as a guy who is 6’ and says he rides a 49 kinda makes sense.

I’ll be sure to tell all my buddies who hate riding behind me due to the lack of draft that you said I have a “high stack” and they should be grateful for the added draft it gives them. :wink:

Yeah. citing a pro who is riding a 140 stem to get the necessary reach he needs to fit on that bike is a clear winning argument.

Seigla update:

I did my first local race on the Seigla I purchased some weeks back. I prerode the course a couple of weeks ago with the stock 13 speed XPLR set up with 40t chainring, stock bars, but swapped out the wheels to ENVE G23 with 50mm Terreno Dry’s with TNT casing. After that ride I opted to make some changes.

For the race I swapped on a 38cm ENVE SES All Road bar and ENVE road stem, switched out the 13 speed XPLR cassette and derailleur and put on a SRAM Transmission rear derailleur and 10-52t cassette. Swapped the front ring from 40 to 42t. Switched the wheels out for ENVE 4.5s (25mm ID) with 2.2 Conti Race Kings. I left the rigid fork on.

The course was mixed of pavement and gravel, with lots of short (up to about 1 mile) but steep climgs, rollers, not super rough but some pretty loose gravel in spots. Strava had it at 6600k of climbing over 67 miles.

I was a little concerned the bar might feel too narrow, but it was the opposite. It felt way better. I had thought if I didn’t like it I would put it on my road bike, but my hands and wrists felt great and it never felt unstable.

The 2.2 Conti’s were a revelation on this bike. There has been so much hype about them recently for gravel but they truly changes the feel of the bike. The Terreno Dry 50’s felt really firm and stiff in comparison and didn’t have enough rear traction to allow me to get out of the saddle climbing on the steep climbs. The Race Kings felt much more compliant, soaking thinks up, but then when I stood up they dug in plenty with no slipping. On the pavement they seemed to roll reasonably well to but did making some buzzing (more than a Thunder Burt), but I never felt I was being held back by them. When speeds picked up, such as over rollers, it where I seemed to make up the most time on riders around me. The narrow bar, fast rolling tires, and maybe the 4.5s all seemed to help here.

During the race I consciously thought about whether the higher bottom was something I could notice or not. Honestly I couldn’t notice it. Cornering seemed fine and my position on the bike felt really good. Perhaps a more skilled rider might feel the difference, but for me the bike felt nimble and stable.

I didn’t love having the Garmin mounted on top of the stem. I seemed to be at just the right angle to cause a little bit of glare which made reading the map tricky at times. ENVE has an out front mount for their stem but I’m not sure it is long enough to fit a 1040. The SES All Road bar limits other options.

Overall I’m super happy with the set up. I still need to try it with the 3rd Gen Grit fork - maybe next weekend. I liked my Checkpoint SLR and always appreciated the extra comforted with the IsoSpeed in the rear, but the Seigla feels a lot more dynamic with the current setup.

Dusty post-race pic.

8 Likes

The SES AR bar is a fantastic bar for gravel. Flat tops that aren’t ridiculously deep, so they are extremely comfortable on rough stuff. I wish the reach was 80mm instead of 70, but that is a nit. Fantastic bars.

As for a computer e should be ample room to run a K-Edge or similar on the round part….but you can also just get a stem mounted one like the Chisela from Silca (and there are a number of cheaper options on Amazon).

1 Like

Can also consider a matte screen protector for the Garmin. I have this one (seems to be unavailable right now), and I never have glare problems with it (and they were plentiful before I got it).

2 Likes

Yeah, that made a huge difference for me on my 840.

1 Like

Thanks for the suggestion on the Chisela. It looks like Backcountry/Competitive Cyclist have them on sale so will get one ordered to try. If I’m still getting glare then may add the matte screen protector too.

1 Like

Im 6’3 and ride a 56 factor ostro gravel, the bike fits the same as my 58 sl7. I am running 120mm stem and 125mm stems with 80mm or reach.

Could you tell much difference between the Lauf Smoothie bar and the ENVE SES AR bar in terms of comfort/vibration dampening? I have the same ENVE bar and I’ve been debating swapping it to the Seigla. The Lauf bar seems pretty smooth, but the long reach and s aesthetically. The new Red hoods are just so long, it seems like they’d pair better with a shorter reach bar.

It is a bit of an apples to oranges comparison because I had 50mm Terreno Dry’s on the bike when I used the Lauf Smoothie bar and the 2.2 Race Kings with the ENVE bar. I also think the ENVE’s at 38cm but my hands and wrists in a more ergonomic position which probably over the course of 67 miles made things “feel” a lot better. With the Red hoods turned in some, they felt very natural to hold on to.

That being said, I was watching for harshness with the switch to the ENVE bar, but I didn’t get any of that at all. I had them wrapped in Silca Cuscino 2.5 bar tape, which is pretty comfy tape.

1 Like

Ah, sadly geometrygeeks has duplicate, incorrect entries for the same bike, my bad, I picked this one Geometry Details: Specalized crux 2023

I’d not be bolt upright, because I’d have more seatpost, and a longer stem, but the stack and reach are close to an XL race geometry road bike. Remember also that the longer I extend the seatpost, the further away the bars become.

I mean, that photo shows a bike with ~0cm saddle to bar drop…

That’s fine if it works for you, and it’s a gravel bike anyway - it’s just not long and low.

1 Like

Laughing Gif

It might be the angle of the photo but it really does look like 0cm. Not really sure why I’m getting involved lol, don’t really have any thoughts on your sizing, just the photo.

2 Likes

I had thought the same, but now that I’m looking closely at the photo, the front tire is elevated above the rear, making the bars look higher than they really are.

Please don’t brings facts and logic into an irrational discussion. I clearly am on the wrong size bike.

I will sell my bike and get something smaller….but if someone who is. 6’ is supposed to ride a 49, what size is anyone shorter than that supposed to ride, since that is the smallest size?

Guess I’ll take up bowling instead.

2 Likes

:person_facepalming:

I give up.

It’s OK. Everything’s going to be OK. Here, have a seat, old man.
Old Man Walker GIFs | Tenor

(from a fellow apparent geriatric)

1 Like

@Power13 @wintermute

Kindly stop cluttering this thread with meaningless off topic discussion.

3 Likes

I’m not the one that keeps reviving the issue of my fit with erroneous claims.

Thanks.

(But as noted above, I surrender.)

Pivot quietly dropped its new Vault and I don’t see much on it.

2 Likes