Am I crazy to think that a lot of the “huge tires are always faster” is driven by Unbound? I’ve never ridden there, but it seems uncommonly hard on tires. Most of my events include lots of mild gravel and some pavement too, so the aero and RR penalties of 50mm tires at mid-20s pressures get kinda real. All to say that I’m not certain all manufacturers are going to be releasing frames with 50mm+ clearance…or maybe Unbound is really such a driver of the market and perception that I’m way off base.
1 Like
I agree. Plenty of gravel races still won on 700x40-47. I mean 38 was the norm not long ago. Imo it’s more a product of these pros getting faster more so than them all finally discovering this magic secret. Unbound might be an outlier.
Very curious to see how DJ does and what tires he uses at Crusher next race. That has a lot of elevation and you can’t convince MTB tires are the move their for example.
2 Likes
I’m not saying 50mm tires will always be run, but having a frame that can accommodate them when the conditions call for it will be more normal.
2 Likes
The current Airliners are different than the Airliner Lights that have been out for XC for over a year. However, as mentioned below, the gravel Airliner Light are going to be available to purchase later this month. They had them had the expo at their booth. The big difference is the Airliner Light is made to use as a “run flat” option to try and get you to the finish or next aid station. The standard insert isn’t made as a run flat option. The Tubolight also works as a run flat.
I’ve used both the Airliner Light and Tubolight for XC and do prefer the Airliner Light a little. It seems more sealant ends up clinging to the Tubolight. I thought it might be absorbing some as well, but the manufacturer claims this doesn’t happen. The Tubolight’s also seem to get a bit more beat up over time, but maybe I’m riding into things too hard…
Wouldn’t the run flat style liners affect rolling resistance like the Tannus inserts? While run flat is good, I was more thinking Cushcore style (don’t break the rim) rim protection.
There are some selective/technical spots where bigger tires are certainly an advantage (and flats are a big risk), but most of the gravel this year was pretty tame. They had graded a lot of roads prior to the event and we didn’t have the typical loose/big rock sections that are sometimes there. I’m guessing some of that has to do with the number of people out there pre-riding in the weeks leading up. There were some really bad sections that I saw about a month ago and they had nice smooth lines ridden into them by race day.
I was surprised by Dylan’s result running Conti 2.2’s. He’s a good bike racer, but I honestly didn’t think he had the engine to hang with that kind of group. I don’t know if the tires were helping all day, but it seems pretty clear they weren’t hurting. Looking forward to his race recap. I think Payson might have also been running MTB tires and had a good finish.
2 Likes
DJ, Payson, and Lachlan all ran mtb tires.
1 Like
The Tubolights and Airliner Lights still compress with air pressure in the tire, but they will likely still touch the sidewall, so there may be some small impact in rolling resistance. However you can run lower PSI so it may balance out.
All that being said there are clearly different camps when it comes to inserts and a lot is still getting figured out. I talked for quite a while with the Schwalbe guy at Unbound and they are very anti-insert. They feel that inserts may actually increase chance of flats by making the sidewall more exposed. I believe the Kenda tire folks are in a similar camp and that some of the Kenda athletes are avoiding inserts for that reason. They definitely aren’t a panacea and I got a nasty rim flat running a Kenda Rush 2.4 SCT with inserts last year that I couldn’t plug.
2 Likes
I think that was the point of DJ’s video. The Conti 2.2s didn’t have any real speed penalty compared to the smaller tires. They just had benefits of better rolling resistance, compliance, grip and puncture protection.
I am curious to see what he thinks of the Lauf Fork. Been kicking around the idea myself of either getting a Lauf Fork or Rudy Fork.
3 Likes
P6 Simen Nordahl Svendsen ran Thunder Burts, I think 2.1s.
2 Likes
Amazing result for DJ no doubt. Curious how the tactics played out too. At the end there was an interview with Payson he mentioned feeling not that tired after the race (I’m paraphrasing) and he didn’t even look like he broke a sweat. DJ gave it everything and looked like a ghost. Point being I wonder if these races turning more tactical and cat / mouse helps DJ more now rather than it being a race on just pure power. Either way will be interesting to see how season plays out but I think these results were more of a human result not machine result if that make sense?
Agreed. I guess my point was there is a big difference between 50 and 2.2 MTB in terms of what it does to the bike build / geo. Idk if it’s worth it but I’m sure the industry will find a way to make us spend the money and find out lol
2 Likes
I started gravel racing on my Scott RC FS (100/100) mountain bike and had some pretty solid results on it.
I just bought a new MTB and I’m considering turning the scott into a drop bar gravel racer. I guess FS isn’t ideal, but it’s only a 2-3 pounds heavier than my checkpoint (which is a bit of a pig). It’s got full lockouts to make the bike rigid. Besides drop bars, the only thing that wasn’t great about gravel racing that bike was the 38 chainring limitation. Might be doable with a 9tooth cassette and/or maybe I can squeeze a 40 tooth ring on there.
1 Like
DJ’s power numbers have been continually improving based on his race recaps, so he might not quite have the numbers of the very top guys, he’s getting closer. He’s been neck and neck with Finsty at several events so that is a pretty good measuring stick.
One thing that may have really ended up helping him is the forced rest he took after the throat abscess. This came right after he had done some mega training block.
2 Likes
38 cm seems so narrow after 3 years of 42s and now 47s
5 Likes
According to the cyclingnews image the Morton’s front tyre seems to be a 54 mm (2.1) Terreno Dry. The rear tyre is a Mezcal, but it is a bit hard to see the size: could that be a 44 mm?
3 Likes
Does anyone have experience with Panaracer Seal Smart? Rene Herse recommends the use of it with their Rene Herse tires (hurr durr, doesn’t panaracer make their tires?!). Anyway, I had this sealant in my Extralight Snoqualmie Pass tires and it dried up trough winter.
I wanted to take the tires off and clean them from the old sealant but it was nearly impossible to get the tires off the rim. Once the tire bead was pushed into the rim channel the tires would stick together like they were glued together. I tried leaving them out in the sun, I tried soapy water and one tire I got off the other I had to cut off the rim. In the end I was sweating blood and tears.
This never happened with any tire/sealant rim combination I used on the road or off road. I was riding the Roval CLX 50 (version 1) with the original Conti 5000 TL tires so I know a thing or two about how to get stubborn tires off wheels… But this never happened before. Any thoughts?
I have no specific experience with this product. However, I’ve found that tire sealants in general are incredibly variable in their functionality and durability, and a surprising number just don’t work very well. My general rule is that no matter what a brand recommends, use either Stan’s or Orange Seal.
2 Likes
will revert back to Stans. When I originally mounted the tires I was a bit freaked out about the fact that they were hookless. That was back then when this whole topic started to ‘blow up’ (badum tss) on the internet. So I wanted to do everything “by the book”, caved and got the sealant the manufacturer of the tires recommended. Never again will I buy that sealant. Had to bin a perfectly fine 100$ tire 
1 Like
I think you’re right. 44 mezcal.