The “Tariff Surcharge” method really bugs me as an accountant.
Given that the surcharge is shown next to tax, I should be able to calculate it out just like tax, no?
So in the case of the Kickr Run, from what I can tell is manufactured in Taiwan.
It’s not clear if the surcharge is meant to cover the current 10% blanket tariff or the pending 32% tariffs on Taiwanese goods.
Regardless, if we figure it’s the current 10%, that would mean the declared import value of the treadmill is $2,000, but if it’s the future 32% then the declared import value would be $625.
Is Wahoo really selling us a $625 treadmill for $5,000 and then forcing us to cover the tariff? I feel like 87.5% gross margin can’t possibly be the correct number here… how many manufacturing businesses are that high?
Likewise, does Wahoo maintain the same gross margin on all products? If not, does that mean the tariff surcharge as a percentage of final sale price will vary from item to item?
Alternatively, is Wahoo just throwing a dart at the wall and randomly picking a surcharge number that they expect will cover their total tariff expense and spreading that evenly across all products with no real differentiation between the various import values or origins of each product?
Personally, I think it would make most sense to just include the cost of the tariff as part of the CoGS for each item. I mean for inventory purposes, I would imagine this would have to be done anyways so it’s not even an extra step. Then, increase the the invoice price and msrp of each product to maintain the same margin at the end of the day.
I guess what I’m getting at, if Wahoo isn’t disclosing the CoGS on the treadmill, how do I know that surcharge line is appropriate or if they’re just trying to hose the consumer?