# MAF Method Training

**URL:** <https://www.trainerroad.com/forum/t/maf-method-training/3799>\
**Category:** Training\
**Created:** [October 15, 2018, 6:58am UTC](https://www.trainerroad.com/forum/t/maf-method-training/3799 "2018-10-15T06:58:39Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 6

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DaveWh](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/trainerroad/forum/user_avatar/www.trainerroad.com/davewh/32/13120_2.png) [@DaveWh](https://www.trainerroad.com/forum/u/DaveWh)\
**Post date:** [October 15, 2018, 1:23pm UTC](https://www.trainerroad.com/forum/t/maf-method-training/3799/6 "2018-10-15T13:23:22Z")

</div>

Also check out the threads on Polarized training - similar topic. E.g.

> [@Polarized Training Discussion (Fast Talk podcast & Flo Cycling podcast)](https://www.trainerroad.com/forumt/polarized-training-discussion-on-flo-cycling-podcast/1766/158):
>
> Agree - this was a limitation of the threshold protocol - no high intensity stuff Like I said in my summary takeaway, I don’t view this as showing Polarized is better than Threshold (as defined in the study), but that a Polarized approach delivers improvements at training volumes in the range of 7-8 hrs per week.

---

_[View the full topic](https://www.trainerroad.com/forum/t/maf-method-training/3799)._